Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
11. Your field, apparently, but study shortcomings indicated don't preclude legitimate health concerns.
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 09:31 PM
Mar 2013

I first encountered this material on Chernobyl's impact on public health in the aftermath of Fukushima. The last link is the only one I regard with skepticism.

CHERNOBYL HEART
by Adi Roche


VOICES FROM CHERNOBYL, The Oral History of a Nuclear Disaster
by Svetlana Alexievich (Author), Keith Gessen (Translator)


http://www.c-span.org/Events/Discussion-on-Nuclear-Crisis-in-Japan-and-the-25th-Anniversary-of-Chernobyl/10737420512-1/

http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf
(FREE online PDF (349 pages):
Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment
by Alexey Yablokov (Author), Vassily Nesterenko (Author), Alexey Nesterenko (Author), Janette Sherman-Nevinger (Editor), Dmitry Grodzinsky (Foreword)


Nader on Yablokov study:
http://counterpunch.org/nader04272011.html
April 27, 2011
Concealing the Consequences
Chernobyl 25 Years Later
By RALPH NADER


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2974725/
Yablokov Rebuttal


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Symposium: The Medical an...»Reply #11