Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
In reply to the discussion: The Gun Vote and 2014: Will There Be an Electoral Price? 538 [View all]Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)26. Wayne La Pierre also says anything the puppet master wants him to say, he will say and do anything
even if it is not reasonable and sensible. I think on the background checks there will be some consequences for those who voted with the criminals, terrorist and mentally stable. The no vote also continues the ability to have a national gun register which could begin from social security list, drivers license or voters rolls. Great win for those who does not want a national gun register.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bill Mahar is a comedian and gets paid to say things like that. You know, money. nt
rrneck
Apr 2013
#5
NRA and gun cultists have their own sick reasons for promoting/toting/accumulating guns too.
Hoyt
Apr 2013
#7
Wayne La Pierre also says anything the puppet master wants him to say, he will say and do anything
Thinkingabout
Apr 2013
#26
Then why are those praised for protecting 2nd Amendment rights which voted NO on a bill which made
Thinkingabout
Apr 2013
#30
why should there not be a national gun register, the Senators who voted NO has prevented
Thinkingabout
Apr 2013
#32
You like Crazy Cruz did not read the bill, so much for those who did nit want a national
Thinkingabout
Apr 2013
#34
Good for the USA, to have a data base in which to access in order to know if a gun buyer is a
Thinkingabout
Apr 2013
#36
Once a person steps over the line and becomes a criminal "rights" are lost, stepping
Thinkingabout
Apr 2013
#38
You are wrong on some points but to make it really simple, if you dont care to drive,
Thinkingabout
Apr 2013
#40
If there is an election backlash, then the democratic party will easily win the house
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#6
because your version is just not true, and the NRA knows it.Which is why they want it.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#14
Yeah, straight from the NRA website. We will agree to disagree. you are 100% wrong.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#16
No, you are 100% wrong. It says so right there. End of discussion. It is not definite.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#18
No, it says either OR.. Thank God the bill is dead. It won't return either.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#20
It means that you can carry concealed from SC into NY without fear of prosecution
premium
Apr 2013
#21
Thanks for admitting it. Once it is in, it can be used. Do you think these perps care about law?
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#22
As said, thank God that SC couldn't come in with a gun. That is important.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#24
A land where 35 a day die violently from a gun, 100 wounded, countless others mourn
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#29