Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
In reply to the discussion: The Gun Vote and 2014: Will There Be an Electoral Price? 538 [View all]graham4anything
(11,464 posts)29. A land where 35 a day die violently from a gun, 100 wounded, countless others mourn
A question for you about it-
If you love and desire it so much-
what if the ruling states that the federal guidelines will be such natoinally, that they are the toughest state rule-
i.e.-New York.
So it rules that all the states have to adapt to NYS standards.
If you are true to your belief, then I am happy you like NYS standard, and agree to this, based on what you have said in about 593 of your 700something posts.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bill Mahar is a comedian and gets paid to say things like that. You know, money. nt
rrneck
Apr 2013
#5
NRA and gun cultists have their own sick reasons for promoting/toting/accumulating guns too.
Hoyt
Apr 2013
#7
Wayne La Pierre also says anything the puppet master wants him to say, he will say and do anything
Thinkingabout
Apr 2013
#26
Then why are those praised for protecting 2nd Amendment rights which voted NO on a bill which made
Thinkingabout
Apr 2013
#30
why should there not be a national gun register, the Senators who voted NO has prevented
Thinkingabout
Apr 2013
#32
You like Crazy Cruz did not read the bill, so much for those who did nit want a national
Thinkingabout
Apr 2013
#34
Good for the USA, to have a data base in which to access in order to know if a gun buyer is a
Thinkingabout
Apr 2013
#36
Once a person steps over the line and becomes a criminal "rights" are lost, stepping
Thinkingabout
Apr 2013
#38
You are wrong on some points but to make it really simple, if you dont care to drive,
Thinkingabout
Apr 2013
#40
If there is an election backlash, then the democratic party will easily win the house
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#6
because your version is just not true, and the NRA knows it.Which is why they want it.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#14
Yeah, straight from the NRA website. We will agree to disagree. you are 100% wrong.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#16
No, you are 100% wrong. It says so right there. End of discussion. It is not definite.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#18
No, it says either OR.. Thank God the bill is dead. It won't return either.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#20
It means that you can carry concealed from SC into NY without fear of prosecution
premium
Apr 2013
#21
Thanks for admitting it. Once it is in, it can be used. Do you think these perps care about law?
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#22
As said, thank God that SC couldn't come in with a gun. That is important.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#24
A land where 35 a day die violently from a gun, 100 wounded, countless others mourn
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#29