Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 94 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Supreme Court case tests ...»Reply #11
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court case tests FCC’s power to police TV indecency [View all]

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court case tests FCC’s power to police TV indecency [View all] alp227 Jan 2012 OP
I hope scotus rules against the FCC mr_liberal Jan 2012 #1
As socially liberal as I am it's unwise to allow Scarface to be played uncut on ABC during daytime alp227 Jan 2012 #5
Show me some scientific studies demonstrating how bad words harm children please. n/t backscatter712 Jan 2012 #11
I can show you the general degradation of manners in modern society, for one. alp227 Jan 2012 #12
Show me an article from a peer-reviewed scientific journal. backscatter712 Jan 2012 #14
OK then, using profanity in front of children is usually a crime under 'disturbing the peace' alp227 Jan 2012 #16
Children learn bad language Politicalboi Jan 2012 #2
Good point, but if I can't cuss at a public place if kids are present, alp227 Jan 2012 #4
It has nothing to do with morals. It's about control. Gregorian Jan 2012 #3
+1 Its always 'about saving the children.' I don't buy it, and I'm sick of it n/t Joe Shlabotnik Jan 2012 #6
I have to agree with this. Heywood J Jan 2012 #7
Also, I've always believed that censorship was about protecting adults from being embarrassed. Gregorian Jan 2012 #8
Exactly. I'm wondering if children read DU. backscatter712 Jan 2012 #10
FCC v. Pacifica is an abomination against the First Amendment THAT MUST FUCKING DIE! backscatter712 Jan 2012 #9
Similar to how young people insert "like" as a filler word all the time, young people use cuss words alp227 Jan 2012 #13
This is different from how kids and teens have acted since the beginning of time how? n/t backscatter712 Jan 2012 #15
Let's just drop the pretense, our media is awash in sex and violence, and not much else. nt bemildred Jan 2012 #17
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Supreme Court case tests ...»Reply #11
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2026 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.