Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

MinM

(2,650 posts)
Wed May 15, 2013, 04:00 PM May 2013

Phony IRS “Scandal” — We’ve Been O’Keefe’d Again [View all]

...It turns out the IRS was NOT singling out “Tea Party” groups for audits. The IRS was scrutinizing ALL groups applying for c4 status by asking additional questions. No audits. And only SOME (1/3) of those groups were conservatives — OTHERS were liberal, etc. Doesn’t matter, the right put out a victimization story making it sound like only conservatives were targeted for political reasons. (And Christians are a persecuted minority, Whites are discriminated against, etc.) The “mainstream” news media picked up and spread the lie, and here we are.

Again: Only 1/3 of the organizations that received extra scrutiny were conservative. The rest are not identified, but liberal and progressive organizations are reporting that their applications received the same scrutiny as conservatives. (And by the way almost 70% of the applications that were flagged WERE engaged in campaign activity that would disqualify them from c4 status.)...

Look at how MANY of us fell for one more “pimp costume” story.

James O’Keefe never wore a “pimp costume” into an ACORN office, and conservative groups were not singled out for scrutiny by the IRS. But because of the right’s ability to spread these smears both are now firmly “true” in the public mind. Partly because the rest of us fell for it and helped amplify it.

http://seeingtheforest.com/phony-irs-scandal-weve-been-okeefed-again/
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can we still fire Holder? Or impeach Obama? Buzz Clik May 2013 #1
No kimbutgar May 2013 #10
I really hope that was sarcasm DonCoquixote May 2013 #12
Of course it was sarcasm. Buzz Clik May 2013 #17
Holder kardonb May 2013 #15
Get a rope! Pass the tar and feathers!!!11 Buzz Clik May 2013 #18
Who is we? GeorgeGist May 2013 #2
When you are targeting "tea party" and leave "progressive" alone, you've got a problem. dkf May 2013 #3
Please copy and paste the first two sentences of the excerpt. Wednesdays May 2013 #4
Except the IRS didn't leave them alone... DonViejo May 2013 #5
But progressives were not left alone Bjorn Against May 2013 #6
did that *really* hapen, though? Blue_Tires May 2013 #9
Thank you for your two cents. Hissyspit May 2013 #13
That was Issa's spin from a month ago, please be accurate, even if it means foregoing a chance to geek tragedy Jun 2013 #23
Good Thing They Didn't Do That Then. -eom gcomeau Jun 2013 #27
It just doesn't matter. So the IRS did NOT single out Tea Party groups................ wandy May 2013 #7
IMHO, the IRS was right to heighten the scrutiny of 501(c)4 applications from Tea Party groups . . . John1956PA May 2013 #8
I agree with you on that point amerciti001 May 2013 #11
Thanks. I appreciate your post of yesterday evening, May 14, about the Tea Party seeking grants. John1956PA May 2013 #16
Citations please. dorkulon May 2013 #14
.. Buzz Clik May 2013 #19
It wouldn't be quite so easy for the RW to get away with this BlueStreak May 2013 #20
. blkmusclmachine May 2013 #21
Yep, we were “O’Keefed” again. MinM Jun 2013 #22
So those think tanks libodem Jun 2013 #24
recommended! Bill USA Jun 2013 #25
I can't say anything bad enough about the Progressive dog Jun 2013 #26
Now how long until the Snowden fans realize the same thing? -eom gcomeau Jun 2013 #28
Fox Manufactures White House Link To IRS Controversy MinM Jul 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Phony IRS “Scandal” — We’...»Reply #0