Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
11. I think ...
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 09:50 PM
Aug 2013

you are conflating corporate taxation with individual taxation.
To argue that higher corporate taxation rates has no negative impact on job growth is just plain non-factual.

Mind you ... I am not arguing for trickle-down.

But that said, in the context of this proposal, why shouldn't we reduce the corporate statutory rate, while closing loop holes ... thereby, raising the effective rate? Especially, in the context of tying such a move to infrastructure repair (jobs), incentizing on shoring of manufacturing jobs (more jobs), incentizing investments in small business (more jobs), a minimum corporate tax (revenue), and punishing off-shoring of profits (more revenue)?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»White House - FACT SHEET:...»Reply #11