Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
4. Rewind to just before WWI
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 05:13 PM
Jan 2012

Some articles I've read recently.

Global conflict simmers despite lack of open war

It is absolutely right for China to stick to the path of peaceful development. Meanwhile, however, we should still keep a cool and watchful mind when dealing with international affairs.

...

As summarized in 1986 by Zbigniew Brzezinski, former US national security advisor, the national interest of the US lies in three fronts. The first is the far west where Eastern Europe is the focal point. The second is the far east, where conflicts are centered in countries such as Japan, China and North Korea, and key points of interest lie in South Korea, the Philippines, and Taiwan Island. The third lies in the southwest, where the strategic focuses of the US are Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan.

Today, the US has been carrying out strategies on all the three fronts. It has further squeezed Russia's space through NATO expansion. The "return to Asia" has stirred up huge waves of tension around China.

In the Islamic world, the US has brought down Iraq, Libya, Sudan, and Yemen. Now it is pressuring Syria and Iran, as well as Pakistan.

...
http://www.globaltimes.cn/NEWS/tabid/99/ID/691787/Global-conflict-simmers-despite-lack-of-open-war.aspx



The US Plan to Destabilize Sudan
by THOMAS C. MOUNTAIN

As South Sudan implodes in a growing mass insanity of ethnic violence and once again tens of thousands have to flee for their lives the warning signs all point towards the US plan to destabilize Sudan having begun to hit its stride.

To start with, the US pays the salaries for the Sudan Peoples Liberation Army (SPLA, the national army of South Sudan), over $100 million in 2011 alone. Does a country really have independence when a foreign power pays its army’s salaries? Whose orders is the army really going to follow?

Today, thousands of UN “peacekeepers” are pouring into South Sudan. These “peacekeepers” are almost entirely from next door Ethiopia and are part of an Ethiopian military carrying out a counterinsurgency/genocide in the Ogaden in south east Ethiopia.

An Ethiopian military that has repeatedly invaded Somali acting under orders from the USA. The same Ethiopian army that six years earlier invaded Eritrea. “Peacekeepers” indeed.
The Ethiopian “peacekeepers” salaries, all their expenses actually, are being paid for by Uncle Sam.

..
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/01/10/the-us-plan-to-destabilize-sudan/



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes, we haven't exploited Africa nearly enough yet Hugabear Jan 2012 #1
Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #2
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2012 #3
Rewind to just before WWI jakeXT Jan 2012 #4
+1 xchrom Jan 2012 #5
unmmm... bonzotex Jan 2012 #6
China is fast becoming an imperialist power TigerToMany Jan 2012 #7
The west continues to trade arms for "blood diamonds" and other resources. McCamy Taylor Jan 2012 #8
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»The war is with China, th...»Reply #4