Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)

2. Yes...I should have included this update

Reply to JimDandy (Reply #1)

Tue Oct 15, 2013, 10:29 AM

Oct 2013

Update: Great News! SciAm has reposted Dr. Lee’s original post, claiming to now have “verified the exchange” (as if this was ever reasonably in doubt). This is a victory nonetheless, and it establishes that SciAm does believe that Dr. Lee’s experiences are important to their audience. We could not agree more.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

For shame: Trolls defeat Scientific American, Popular Science [View all] cyberswede Oct 2013 OP

Her blog entry is back on SciAm's site. n/t JimDandy Oct 2013 #1

Yes...I should have included this update cyberswede Oct 2013 #2

I see this happening more and more often in the future n2doc Oct 2013 #3

I agree. It's a shame people can't be more mature. cyberswede Oct 2013 #4

It's also very difficult to have truly science based discussions online. HuckleB Oct 2013 #5

I'm glad Dr. Lee decided not to work for free. Manifestor_of_Light Oct 2013 #6

You're right cyberswede Oct 2013 #7

Censor those "trolls and spam-bots." proverbialwisdom Oct 2013 #8

"A scientist hits out after her views are misrepresented in an article on GM crops" in the COMMENTS. proverbialwisdom Oct 2013 #9

Imagine the comments this might deservedly inspire. proverbialwisdom Oct 2013 #10