Editorials & Other Articles
In reply to the discussion: That herbal supplement may not be what you think it is, scientists find [View all]Bill USA
(6,436 posts)your words are consistently show you have no connection to reality.
When I catch you out in contradicting the study you referred to (not difficult at all to do) you say you were referring to "another" study... without mentioning or giving a link to this mysterious "other study". Obviously, there was no "other study" you were thinking of.. you made it up to have a response and to slip out of being shown to be a nonsense peddlar.
You put words in you comments like you are putting together a mosaic of cool sounding words - but the words as put together make no sense with regard to your point or your ensuing comments.
Just dreaming up 'cool' (to you) sounding statements is no substitute for making some sense. Your behavior is properly identified as out of touch with reality and therefor functionally insane.
the study you referred to (inOP) showed that two supplement suppliers [font color="red"] "provided authentic products without substitutions, contaminants or fillers." [/font]
that's a quote from the article about the study on the University of Guelph site. So I guess then you are saying the study you posted about is not accurate or intellecutally honest"
THe reality is, as the study you posted about showed, there are suppliers of supplements who do provide quality products "without substitutions, contaminants or fillers." That's why I said that you can find quality suppliers if you make a moderate effort to.
Your comments fail to make any sense whatsoever. You are just throwing words together that you have seen and heard and liked but you have to be able to put them together in a sensible sentence with respect to the point you are trying to make. Your statements fail the most basic test of meaningfulness. This you don't seem to be capable of doing.