Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
Showing Original Post only (View all)Could Sen. Warren Overtake Hillary Clinton in 2016? [View all]
When people think about the 2016 presidential election, the first name that may come to mind is Hillary Clinton. Theres a growing expectation that Democrats will turn to Clinton as a candidate when the next national election rolls around, but a fresh new face has also cropped up.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is a more liberal candidate compared to Clinton, who falls toward the center of Democratic policy, the Washington Post reports. Recent proof that Warren could offer a marked change from the policies of President Barack Obama whose approval rating has been waning came in the form of budget debates.
Obama has been looking to decrease Social Security benefits in order to pass a budget agreement with Republicans. The effort to do so has largely been given up by liberals who dont want to make such concession, Warren included.
The absolute last thing we should do in 2013 at the very moment that Social Security has become the principal lifeline for millions of our seniors is allow the program to begin to be dismantled inch by inch, Warren said to the Senate, according to the Washington Post. Some consider the unyielding stance a risky move for Democrats, while others view Warrens position as a much-needed change from present leadership.
I personally have Clinton fatigue, noting that it was a Clinton team that has been running Obamas economics. A Clinton administration seems like a continuation of the same team, Lawrence Mishel, the president of the labor-backed Economic Policy, said to the Washington Post.
http://wallstcheatsheet.com/stocks/could-sen-warren-overtake-hillary-clinton-in-2016.html/?a=viewall
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is a more liberal candidate compared to Clinton, who falls toward the center of Democratic policy, the Washington Post reports. Recent proof that Warren could offer a marked change from the policies of President Barack Obama whose approval rating has been waning came in the form of budget debates.
Obama has been looking to decrease Social Security benefits in order to pass a budget agreement with Republicans. The effort to do so has largely been given up by liberals who dont want to make such concession, Warren included.
The absolute last thing we should do in 2013 at the very moment that Social Security has become the principal lifeline for millions of our seniors is allow the program to begin to be dismantled inch by inch, Warren said to the Senate, according to the Washington Post. Some consider the unyielding stance a risky move for Democrats, while others view Warrens position as a much-needed change from present leadership.
I personally have Clinton fatigue, noting that it was a Clinton team that has been running Obamas economics. A Clinton administration seems like a continuation of the same team, Lawrence Mishel, the president of the labor-backed Economic Policy, said to the Washington Post.
http://wallstcheatsheet.com/stocks/could-sen-warren-overtake-hillary-clinton-in-2016.html/?a=viewall
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anyone's better than the Queen Blue Dog and Third Way Princess of the DLC.
blkmusclmachine
Dec 2013
#30