Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
Tue Jan 7, 2014, 04:39 PM Jan 2014

Starfish die off in the NW Pacific [View all]

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by cyberswede (a host of the Editorials & Other Articles forum).

We've all heard about how the starfish have been dying in the waters in the NW Pacific Ocean. Divers claim to have seen them melt away right before their eyes. Melting is what happens when a starfish dies. So what is making the starfish die? No one seems to know. So I have done a bit of research and in the following posts will share that research with you.

In summary, starfish are known to be an umbrella specie. That means that if the starfish were to go extinct, many other species that are dependent on starfish would also be in danger. Starfish are fairly unique in that they can regenerate parts of their bodies. How they do that is not exactly clear. But in that sense they are very special.

Starfish eat many things. Mostly bottom dwelling things. Like mussels. It has been discovered that if starfish are removed from some locations, mussel populations explode. In one report linked below, it has been discovered that mussels near Alaska have very high concentrations of radioisotopes. The starfish eat these mussels and the radioisotopes then are in the starfish. Known as moving up the food chain.

How do mussels get the plutonium in them? Mussels are filter feeders. Mussels feed by filtering water and taking suspended solids from that water. Plutonium, and other heavy metals drift to the bottom where the mussels are, and the mussels, in their feeding, filter out the plutonium which ends up in the mussel's meat which the starfish eat.

Conclusion: Atmospheric deposition of radioisotopes from Fukushima is established. Plutonium from Fukushima has been found in mussels in the NW Pacific. Starfish eat mussels. Starfish are dying and causing researchers great alarm. It is possible that plutonium is killing the starfish.

31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Starfish die off in the NW Pacific [View all] RobertEarl Jan 2014 OP
Department of Energy report of sampling finds Fukushima deposition RobertEarl Jan 2014 #1
What makes you think that any of the plutonium is from Fukushima? FBaggins Jan 2014 #5
Other starfish facts RobertEarl Jan 2014 #2
You posted this in Good Reads FBaggins Jan 2014 #3
We will be the last to know newfie11 Jan 2014 #4
Link? Please check out SOP, need article, blog or other published material. uppityperson Jan 2014 #6
For your edification, it's "species" Aldo Leopold Jan 2014 #7
The grammar is the least of this post's problems. nt longship Jan 2014 #23
Minor problem with your hypothesis jeff47 Jan 2014 #8
Yup. Documented back in the 1980's longship Jan 2014 #9
Interesting RobertEarl Jan 2014 #10
Not clear does not mean people get to make up anything they want. longship Jan 2014 #11
The DOE has found Fukushima material in the Pacific. RobertEarl Jan 2014 #14
Where's your data that sea stars are being effected by Fukushima? longship Jan 2014 #16
So the nuclear waste has a time machine? jeff47 Jan 2014 #12
Yep RobertEarl Jan 2014 #13
And that's why your OP blame it on Fukushima? jeff47 Jan 2014 #15
Let's refresh your memory RobertEarl Jan 2014 #18
Common sense??????? longship Jan 2014 #21
Which, of course is why they're dying in larger numbers... FBaggins Jan 2014 #25
Common sense also tells us that time runs in one direction. jeff47 Jan 2014 #29
Funny. No marine biologists agree with that hypothesis. longship Jan 2014 #17
More problems FBaggins Jan 2014 #26
Err... X_Digger Jan 2014 #19
Yes. RobertEarl Jan 2014 #20
Of course, it HAS to be radiation. longship Jan 2014 #22
Three Reasons Why Fukushima Radiation Has Nothing to Do with Starfish Wasting Syndrome Bonobo Jan 2014 #24
So...your "conclusion" is....that something is "possible"? A HERETIC I AM Jan 2014 #27
Can you post some links for this? Agschmid Jan 2014 #28
I thought this was "Good Reads" zappaman Jan 2014 #30
Locking cyberswede Jan 2014 #31
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Starfish die off in the N...