Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
1. Department of Energy report of sampling finds Fukushima deposition
Tue Jan 7, 2014, 04:41 PM
Jan 2014

In this report from the DOE, US government, it is described why they test for radioisotopes, where they test, when they test and some test findings. Note the bolded listing for plutonium found in the mussels that were tested. This finding confirms the idea that plutonium can be passed up the food chain to the starfish.
*********************

US Gov’t: Alaska island “appears to show impacts from Fukushima” — “Significant cesium isotope signature” detected — Scientists anticipate more marine life to be impacted as ocean plume arrives

http://enenews.com/us-govt-headline-alaska-island-appears-to-show-impacts-from-fukushima-significant-cesium-isotope-signature-detected-video


Department of Energy: Biological Monitoring at Amchitka Appears to Show Impacts from Fukushima Dai-ichi Incident.

The U.S. Department of Energy Office Legacy Management (LM) has a long-term stewardship mission to protect human health and the environment from the legacy of underground nuclear testing conducted at Amchitka Island, Alaska, from 1965 to 1971. Atmospheric monitoring in the United States showed elevated cesium activities shortly after the nuclear incident. LM scientists anticipated that atmospheric transport of cesium would potentially increase the cesium activities in the 2011 biological samples collected near Amchitka. Because cesium-134 has a relatively short half-life of 2 years and indicates leakage from a nuclear reactor, it is a clear indicator of a recent nuclear accident.

Because the Amchitka 2011 sampling event occurred soon after the Fukushima nuclear accident, the biota impacted by atmospheric precipitation showed the greatest impact (e.g., species that live in freshwater or shallow ocean waters) when compared to marine biota living in deeper water. This is because ocean currents are a slower transport process than wind currents. LM scientists anticipate that the marine biota will show the impacts of Fukushima during the next sampling event, currently scheduled to occur in 2016.

* Plutonium-239 — .039 pCi/kg Dolly Varden
* Plutonium-239 — .186 pCi/kg Goose Egg no shell
* Plutonium-239 — .104 pCi/kg Gull egg
* Plutonium-239 — .298 pCi/kg Chiton
* Plutonium-239 — .093 pCi/kg Dragon Kelp
* Plutonium-239 — .084 pCi/kg Rockweed
* Plutonium-239 — .379 pCi/kg Greeling
* Plutonium-239 — .038 pCi/kg Halibut
* Plutonium-239 — 4.194 pCi/kg Horse Mussel tissue
* Plutonium-239 — .378 pCi/kg Irish Lord
* Plutonium-239 — .036 pCi/kg Octopus
* Plutonium-239 — .05 pCi/kg Pacific Cod
* Plutonium-239 — .279 pCi/kg Rockfish
* Plutonium-239 — .152 pCi/kg Reindeer Lichen
* Plutonium-239 — .195 pCi/kg Sea Urchin







Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Starfish die off in the NW Pacific [View all] RobertEarl Jan 2014 OP
Department of Energy report of sampling finds Fukushima deposition RobertEarl Jan 2014 #1
What makes you think that any of the plutonium is from Fukushima? FBaggins Jan 2014 #5
Other starfish facts RobertEarl Jan 2014 #2
You posted this in Good Reads FBaggins Jan 2014 #3
We will be the last to know newfie11 Jan 2014 #4
Link? Please check out SOP, need article, blog or other published material. uppityperson Jan 2014 #6
For your edification, it's "species" Aldo Leopold Jan 2014 #7
The grammar is the least of this post's problems. nt longship Jan 2014 #23
Minor problem with your hypothesis jeff47 Jan 2014 #8
Yup. Documented back in the 1980's longship Jan 2014 #9
Interesting RobertEarl Jan 2014 #10
Not clear does not mean people get to make up anything they want. longship Jan 2014 #11
The DOE has found Fukushima material in the Pacific. RobertEarl Jan 2014 #14
Where's your data that sea stars are being effected by Fukushima? longship Jan 2014 #16
So the nuclear waste has a time machine? jeff47 Jan 2014 #12
Yep RobertEarl Jan 2014 #13
And that's why your OP blame it on Fukushima? jeff47 Jan 2014 #15
Let's refresh your memory RobertEarl Jan 2014 #18
Common sense??????? longship Jan 2014 #21
Which, of course is why they're dying in larger numbers... FBaggins Jan 2014 #25
Common sense also tells us that time runs in one direction. jeff47 Jan 2014 #29
Funny. No marine biologists agree with that hypothesis. longship Jan 2014 #17
More problems FBaggins Jan 2014 #26
Err... X_Digger Jan 2014 #19
Yes. RobertEarl Jan 2014 #20
Of course, it HAS to be radiation. longship Jan 2014 #22
Three Reasons Why Fukushima Radiation Has Nothing to Do with Starfish Wasting Syndrome Bonobo Jan 2014 #24
So...your "conclusion" is....that something is "possible"? A HERETIC I AM Jan 2014 #27
Can you post some links for this? Agschmid Jan 2014 #28
I thought this was "Good Reads" zappaman Jan 2014 #30
Locking cyberswede Jan 2014 #31
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Starfish die off in the N...»Reply #1