Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

longship

(40,416 posts)
21. Common sense???????
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 12:47 AM
Jan 2014

Last edited Wed Jan 8, 2014, 01:46 AM - Edit history (1)

Common sense says that Sol orbits Terra.

It takes real scientific methodology to find out what nature tells us.

So where is that data that connects radiation -- let alone Fukushima Daiichi -- to sea star meltdown? The marine biologists who have been studying this for decades disagree with your hypothesis.

The data that supports it, please?

Still waiting.

(Crickets)

On edit: more crickets.

Starfish die off in the NW Pacific [View all] RobertEarl Jan 2014 OP
Department of Energy report of sampling finds Fukushima deposition RobertEarl Jan 2014 #1
What makes you think that any of the plutonium is from Fukushima? FBaggins Jan 2014 #5
Other starfish facts RobertEarl Jan 2014 #2
You posted this in Good Reads FBaggins Jan 2014 #3
We will be the last to know newfie11 Jan 2014 #4
Link? Please check out SOP, need article, blog or other published material. uppityperson Jan 2014 #6
For your edification, it's "species" Aldo Leopold Jan 2014 #7
The grammar is the least of this post's problems. nt longship Jan 2014 #23
Minor problem with your hypothesis jeff47 Jan 2014 #8
Yup. Documented back in the 1980's longship Jan 2014 #9
Interesting RobertEarl Jan 2014 #10
Not clear does not mean people get to make up anything they want. longship Jan 2014 #11
The DOE has found Fukushima material in the Pacific. RobertEarl Jan 2014 #14
Where's your data that sea stars are being effected by Fukushima? longship Jan 2014 #16
So the nuclear waste has a time machine? jeff47 Jan 2014 #12
Yep RobertEarl Jan 2014 #13
And that's why your OP blame it on Fukushima? jeff47 Jan 2014 #15
Let's refresh your memory RobertEarl Jan 2014 #18
Common sense??????? longship Jan 2014 #21
Which, of course is why they're dying in larger numbers... FBaggins Jan 2014 #25
Common sense also tells us that time runs in one direction. jeff47 Jan 2014 #29
Funny. No marine biologists agree with that hypothesis. longship Jan 2014 #17
More problems FBaggins Jan 2014 #26
Err... X_Digger Jan 2014 #19
Yes. RobertEarl Jan 2014 #20
Of course, it HAS to be radiation. longship Jan 2014 #22
Three Reasons Why Fukushima Radiation Has Nothing to Do with Starfish Wasting Syndrome Bonobo Jan 2014 #24
So...your "conclusion" is....that something is "possible"? A HERETIC I AM Jan 2014 #27
Can you post some links for this? Agschmid Jan 2014 #28
I thought this was "Good Reads" zappaman Jan 2014 #30
Locking cyberswede Jan 2014 #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Starfish die off in the N...»Reply #21