Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

PatSeg

(47,421 posts)

2. Well

Reply to rurallib (Reply #1)

Mon Dec 12, 2011, 05:14 PM

Dec 2011

He didn't actually say it was IN the constitution, just that marriage was between a man and a woman WHEN it was written. Of course we also had legal slavery WHEN the constitution was written.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Romney tells gay vet that he may repeal same-sex marriage rights in NH [View all] PatSeg Dec 2011 OP

Marriage is in the constitution, Mitt? Where, please? rurallib Dec 2011 #1

Well PatSeg Dec 2011 #2

They'd jump at the chance to bring that back as well... DCKit Dec 2011 #3

That and child labor! PatSeg Dec 2011 #4

And if Mitten's had his way, slavery would still be legal. /nt Drale Dec 2011 #6

Perhaps Romey wants to go back to what they were Angry Dragon Dec 2011 #5