Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

kristopher

(29,798 posts)

5. 'Irrelevant' is a good choice of words

Reply to bananas (Reply #3)

Sat Feb 22, 2014, 01:53 PM

Feb 2014

But it's only from the view of monetary cost. In terms of lost time and perpetuation of the economic system favoring coal nuclear has a definite overall negative impact on the effort to move away from carbon.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Japanese/Korean academic researchers respond to Hansen etal on nuclear power [View all] kristopher Feb 2014 OP

Excellent article, worth reading in full. nt bananas Feb 2014 #1

Thanks madokie Feb 2014 #2

Their first reference shows that nuclear energy is irrelevant bananas Feb 2014 #3

'Irrelevant' is a good choice of words kristopher Feb 2014 #5

Restricting nuclear power has little effect on the cost of climate policies John ONeill Jul 2018 #6

K&R cprise Feb 2014 #4