Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,546 posts)
2. He planned for a contingency.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:33 PM
Mar 2014

That's what you plan for.

Unless the FSB sent in diversionary groups to engineer the Euromaidan's late-January evolution and the following events, the excuses offered by Putin wouldn't have been available. The planning wouldn't have been useful in the short-term, and may not have worked out for many years. Kiselev, in fact, might have moved on. Putin plans for the long-term. We see that as a constant criticism of the West--we plan short term for the most part. We hear it from Islamists, we hear it from Russophiles, we hear it from all sorts of folk. Perhaps one day we'll learn. We used to plan long-term rather well. Something broke along the way.

Still, let's not make the foe superhuman. He just hasn't forgotten something we used to know; perhaps we can re-learn that skill. I doubt it, though: It takes a certain amount of elitism to look over the current situation and say that short-term loss is fine if it yields short-term gain. Those who mostly feel the objective effects of the short-term loss are likely to be in the bottom half of the income spectrum, which is decidedly more than 1/2 of the population.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»1984 in 2014: A new propa...»Reply #2