Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
5. A person has to be pretty high to deny the impact.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 01:45 PM
Apr 2014

There certainly can be a debate about how long-lasting the effects are. And there can be a scientific research about how much permanent damage is done. And the strength of addiction is certainly a valid question.

But to deny that there are no impacts seems really silly to me. I can choose to continue to drink even though I know the many adverse health effects. I don't deny those effects.

I'm in favor of people having the freedom to get high as long as they don't endanger anybody else in the process. But really, I don't need an MRI to know that a person smoking 10 joints every week has some brain impairment.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Smoke weed, turn into a p...»Reply #5