Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

KoKo

(84,711 posts)

1. I tend to go with the source links to read the articles as they were written...

Reply to petronius (Original post)

Fri May 2, 2014, 11:30 AM

May 2014

and then check out who wrote them.

It's still a good place to get started for leads to do further research. But, it's good to be reminded that information there is not complete and can be misleading or biased.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wikipedia: where truth dies online [View all] petronius May 2014 OP

I tend to go with the source links to read the articles as they were written... KoKo May 2014 #1

Very true - the references portion is a valuable part of any wiki page, petronius May 2014 #4

You mean, like this? DetlefK May 2014 #2

I hadn't seen that before, but I think that's what they had in mind petronius May 2014 #3

When we were kids back in those days, Brigid May 2014 #5

I used to edit on Wikipedia davidpdx May 2014 #6

I imagine it's an interesting experience. But yeah, the proverbial pinch of salt is needed. arcane1 May 2014 #9

I was involved in one of those edit wars once wyldwolf May 2014 #7

The new York times: where less about Iraq killed many nt Jemon May 2014 #8