Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(164,155 posts)
4. Why attack the author, Robert Parry?
Sat May 3, 2014, 05:49 AM
May 2014

What does he say you find unacceptable?

What writer would you suggest his readers start looking for after they rush to forget Robert Parry, after seeing your valuable assessment? Show them the way.

His Wikipedia:


Robert Parry is an American investigative journalist best known for his role in covering the Iran-Contra affair for the Associated Press and Newsweek, including breaking the Psychological Operations in Guerrilla Warfare (CIA manual provided to the Nicaraguan contras) and the CIA and Contras cocaine trafficking in the US scandal in 1985. He was awarded the George Polk Award for National Reporting in 1984. He has been the editor of ConsortiumNews.com since 1995.

Career[edit]

Parry joined the Associated Press in 1974, moving to its Washington bureau in 1977. After the 1980 presidential election he was assigned to its Special Assignment (investigative reporting) unit, where he began working on Central America.[1] In 1982 Parry noted the treatment received by the New York Times' Raymond Bonner, who was vilified and pushed out after reporting on the El Mozote massacre, an incident deeply unhelpful to the US government's effort to support the El Salvador government.[1]

Parry was awarded the George Polk Award for National Reporting in 1984 for his work with the Associated Press on Iran-Contra, where he broke the story that the Central Intelligence Agency had provided an assassination manual to the Nicaraguan Contras (Psychological Operations in Guerrilla Warfare).[2][3] In mid-1985 he wrote the first article on Oliver North's involvement in the affair, and, together with Brian Barger, in late 1985 he broke the CIA and Contras cocaine trafficking in the US scandal,[4] helping to spark Senator John Kerry's interest in investigating Iran-Contra.[5] The Associated Press had refused to publish the drug trafficking story, and only relented when its Spanish-language newswire service accidentally published a translation.[3] Barger and Parry continued to press their investigation of North even as most of the media declined to follow it up, eventually publishing a story in mid-1986, based on 24 sources, which led to a Congressional committee asking questions of North. After North denied the allegations, Barger was pushed out of Associated Press, and Parry was unable to publish any further follow-ups to the story until after Eugene Hasenfus' plane (Corporate Air Services HPF821) was shot down in Nicaragua in October 1986.[1] After finding out that his boss had been "conferring with [Oliver] North on a regular basis", Parry left AP in 1987 to join Newsweek.[3] At Newsweek an early story concerned United States National Security Council staff being ordered by the White House to cover up aspects of the Iran-Contra affair, which Newsweek, under great political and media pressure, asked Parry to retract, despite his source holding firm. Parry refused, and he eventually left in Newsweek in 1990.[6]

In August 1990 PBS' Frontline asked Parry to work on the October Surprise conspiracy theory,[1] leading to Parry making several documentaries for the program,[6][7][8] broadcast in 1991 and 1992. He continued to pursue it after a Congressional investigation had concluded the story was untrue, turning his Frontline research into a book published in 1993,[9] and in 1994 he unearthed "a treasure-trove of government documents" supporting the theory,[6] "showing that the [Congressional] task force suppressed incriminating CIA testimony and excluded evidence of big-money links between wealthy Republicans and Carter's Iranian intermediary, Cyrus Hashemi".[3] In 1996 Salon.com wrote about his work on the theory, saying that "his continuing quest to unearth the facts of the alleged October Surprise has made him persona non grata among those who worship at the altar of conventional wisdom."[6]

Consortium News[edit]

In November 1995, Parry established Consortium News as an online ezine dedicated to investigative journalism, describing it in 2004 as "a home for important, well-reported stories that weren't welcome in the O.J. Simpson-obsessed, conventional-wisdom-driven national news media of that time". From 2000 to 2004, he also worked for the financial wire service Bloomberg.[10]

Subjects of Parry's articles and reports on Consortium News include the presidency of George W. Bush,[11] the career of Army general and Bush Secretary of State Colin Powell (with Norman Solomon),[12] the October Surprise controversy of the 1980 election,[13] the Nicaraguan contra-cocaine investigation,[14] the efforts to impeach President Clinton,[15] right-wing terrorism in Latin America,[16] the political influence of Sun Myung Moon,[17] mainstream American media imbalance,[18] United States Secretary of Defense Robert Gates,[19] the presidency of Barack Obama,[20] the influence of Sarah Palin,[21] efforts to rewrite history[22] as well as international stories.[23]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Parry_(journalist)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Answer: RT....and "Consortium News." nt MADem May 2014 #1
You nailed it. nt EmilyAnne May 2014 #2
Did s/he? Hissyspit May 2014 #3
He nailed the fact that RT and Consortium are propagandist. EmilyAnne May 2014 #13
So is the U.S. government. Hissyspit May 2014 #30
Why attack the author, Robert Parry? Judi Lynn May 2014 #4
Truth hurts, I guess ...... polly7 May 2014 #6
+1 newfie11 May 2014 #9
Not to miss Parry links. He has earned my respect. Thank you, Polly. n/t Judi Lynn May 2014 #34
He's promoting a wildly anti gay propaganda machine for his own profit and self promotion Bluenorthwest May 2014 #12
In which case you will then admit the Stances of the current Leaders of Ukraine? newthinking May 2014 #24
Where did I "attack the author" or even mention his name? Don't do that. I will point it out. MADem May 2014 #17
I'll for one go on record in saying Parry has mortgaged away whatever credibility he had left. Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #46
+1000 NT Adrahil May 2014 #35
oops, replied to wrong post ... nt. polly7 May 2014 #5
RT lies about the anti gay laws, about gay people. Bluenorthwest May 2014 #7
After being lied into a war in Iraq I don't take anything coming from our MSM as truth. newfie11 May 2014 #8
at least the MSM Duckhunter935 May 2014 #16
It doesn't have to be one or the other. JoeyT May 2014 #10
RT Duckhunter935 May 2014 #11
How do you know they are lying - TBF May 2014 #14
This kind of reminds me of creationist arguments. Adrahil May 2014 #36
And your comment sort of reminds me of the book 1984 - TBF May 2014 #41
LOL.... Suuuurrrreeee... Adrahil May 2014 #42
Who do you think owns the media here - TBF May 2014 #43
Sure buddy... keep watching RT. I'll keep laughing. NT. Adrahil May 2014 #44
Why do we have to choose one? bvar22 May 2014 #15
No it isn't. RT is the personal propaganda arm of Vladimir Putin. MADem May 2014 #19
...and you believe that Thom Hartmann is Putin's Puppet? bvar22 May 2014 #20
He's his prostitute, at a minimum. So's Larry King and anyone who takes money from the MADem May 2014 #21
Nobody "Praised Putin". bvar22 May 2014 #25
You're wasting your time. Oakenshield May 2014 #27
My posts aren't for the handful of blind Party hacks. bvar22 May 2014 #29
You are not alone. There are others here who also hope to reach progressives, not interlopers. Judi Lynn May 2014 #47
RT is not a trusted source nor are many US sources. It is not wise to try and frame the Jefferson23 May 2014 #18
Good points, but some would say it is most prudent to affect change from within the system. Ash_F May 2014 #22
Thanks. I understand that RT affords an avenue to Thom and others, but it does Jefferson23 May 2014 #26
RT employs people like Hartmann for one reason only.... Adrahil May 2014 #37
Thom and people like him are between a rock and a hard place b/c they do Jefferson23 May 2014 #38
I appreciate his position.... Adrahil May 2014 #39
Yes, I think so too. The Russians dissenters, who we ultimately stand behind, Jefferson23 May 2014 #40
RT Igel May 2014 #23
long read Duckhunter935 May 2014 #28
The events leading up to the arson are still coming to light newthinking May 2014 #31
Excellent, excellent deconstruction analysis. Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #48
Both. OnyxCollie May 2014 #32
Rt.com is the clear answer for anyone who fails to belong geek tragedy May 2014 #33
Easy. RT FBaggins May 2014 #45
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Who’s the Propagandist: U...»Reply #4