Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,510 posts)
46. I'll for one go on record in saying Parry has mortgaged away whatever credibility he had left.
Wed May 7, 2014, 11:12 PM
May 2014

Yes, back in the day the man may have been a respectable investigative journalist, but if you look at any of his recent articles on the Ukrainian crisis, it is nothing but RT Russian propaganda spin and blatant pandering to the western conspiracy crowd.

Parry's essentially the Cuba Gooding Jr. of journalists--at one time award-winning and someone who showed a lot of depth and promise. And then somewhere along the line he got knocked off track, and you look at him and he's doing the journalistic equivalent of "Boat Trip", "Daddy Day Camp" or some straight to DVD hot mess.

For example, in one of his most recent pieces concerning the recent deadly riots, instead of noting the fact that the violence was two-sided, and that the ultimate deadly blaze at the trade union building was in part provoked by Pro-Russian gunmen apparently shooting at Pro-Ukrainian demonstrators, he instead choose the cheap way out and reported as if the Pro-Ukrainian mob had marched over to the building without any sort of provocation whatsoever. And then he compares it to World War II atrocities in which any similarity is surface deep. In other words, complete and utter parroting of the Pro-Russian line. Real investigative journalists don't do blatant and in your face propaganda pieces like that. They don't distort or misrepresent the truth like that.

I honestly don't know who's worse--Parry, who years ago had journalistic scruples but now is nothing more than a sensationalist shill for a repressive, imperialistic government; or RT's Man in Havan--err, I mean Slovyansk, Graham Phillips, who's essentially a glorified British sex tourist in Ukraine who somehow managed to weasel his way into a war reporter job and who makes undeniably biased statements of his own personal beliefs in the process. Both have provided a great disservice to fair, accurate and objective reporting in this very serious story.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Answer: RT....and "Consortium News." nt MADem May 2014 #1
You nailed it. nt EmilyAnne May 2014 #2
Did s/he? Hissyspit May 2014 #3
He nailed the fact that RT and Consortium are propagandist. EmilyAnne May 2014 #13
So is the U.S. government. Hissyspit May 2014 #30
Why attack the author, Robert Parry? Judi Lynn May 2014 #4
Truth hurts, I guess ...... polly7 May 2014 #6
+1 newfie11 May 2014 #9
Not to miss Parry links. He has earned my respect. Thank you, Polly. n/t Judi Lynn May 2014 #34
He's promoting a wildly anti gay propaganda machine for his own profit and self promotion Bluenorthwest May 2014 #12
In which case you will then admit the Stances of the current Leaders of Ukraine? newthinking May 2014 #24
Where did I "attack the author" or even mention his name? Don't do that. I will point it out. MADem May 2014 #17
I'll for one go on record in saying Parry has mortgaged away whatever credibility he had left. Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #46
+1000 NT Adrahil May 2014 #35
oops, replied to wrong post ... nt. polly7 May 2014 #5
RT lies about the anti gay laws, about gay people. Bluenorthwest May 2014 #7
After being lied into a war in Iraq I don't take anything coming from our MSM as truth. newfie11 May 2014 #8
at least the MSM Duckhunter935 May 2014 #16
It doesn't have to be one or the other. JoeyT May 2014 #10
RT Duckhunter935 May 2014 #11
How do you know they are lying - TBF May 2014 #14
This kind of reminds me of creationist arguments. Adrahil May 2014 #36
And your comment sort of reminds me of the book 1984 - TBF May 2014 #41
LOL.... Suuuurrrreeee... Adrahil May 2014 #42
Who do you think owns the media here - TBF May 2014 #43
Sure buddy... keep watching RT. I'll keep laughing. NT. Adrahil May 2014 #44
Why do we have to choose one? bvar22 May 2014 #15
No it isn't. RT is the personal propaganda arm of Vladimir Putin. MADem May 2014 #19
...and you believe that Thom Hartmann is Putin's Puppet? bvar22 May 2014 #20
He's his prostitute, at a minimum. So's Larry King and anyone who takes money from the MADem May 2014 #21
Nobody "Praised Putin". bvar22 May 2014 #25
You're wasting your time. Oakenshield May 2014 #27
My posts aren't for the handful of blind Party hacks. bvar22 May 2014 #29
You are not alone. There are others here who also hope to reach progressives, not interlopers. Judi Lynn May 2014 #47
RT is not a trusted source nor are many US sources. It is not wise to try and frame the Jefferson23 May 2014 #18
Good points, but some would say it is most prudent to affect change from within the system. Ash_F May 2014 #22
Thanks. I understand that RT affords an avenue to Thom and others, but it does Jefferson23 May 2014 #26
RT employs people like Hartmann for one reason only.... Adrahil May 2014 #37
Thom and people like him are between a rock and a hard place b/c they do Jefferson23 May 2014 #38
I appreciate his position.... Adrahil May 2014 #39
Yes, I think so too. The Russians dissenters, who we ultimately stand behind, Jefferson23 May 2014 #40
RT Igel May 2014 #23
long read Duckhunter935 May 2014 #28
The events leading up to the arson are still coming to light newthinking May 2014 #31
Excellent, excellent deconstruction analysis. Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #48
Both. OnyxCollie May 2014 #32
Rt.com is the clear answer for anyone who fails to belong geek tragedy May 2014 #33
Easy. RT FBaggins May 2014 #45
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Who’s the Propagandist: U...»Reply #46