Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,585 posts)
6. And in the right context, that's how you'd put it.
Sat May 17, 2014, 01:22 PM
May 2014

There's be no snark involved, except perhaps for the first, the $7 million, claim. There might be two, the minimum needed for it to be true, but it's far from clear there are two. If it's safe to assume there are at least two, or, even better, a reasonable number (even if it's a minority of them), then the bare plural is just fine.

"Geophysicists make $125k/year" is taken to mean "geophysicists can make up to $125k/year." It might be taken as average, but if it's disambiguated to mean "upper range" instead of "average" few get their nappies knotted. It's certainly not taken to be starting salary.

I've seen people who were particularly embittered, however, try to make it mean "all geophysicists" or "in general". Why? Because it could mean that and they wanted that particular parsing. Context matters.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Larry Kudlow Thinks Teach...»Reply #6