Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

sad sally

(2,627 posts)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 01:12 AM Jan 2012

Supreme Court says no to California's prohibition to the slaughter of non-ambulatory pigs, [View all]

sheep, goats or cattle. No humane euthaniza afforded non-ambulatory slaughterhouse animals.

Supreme Court: Federal Meat Inspection Act preempts California's slaughter ban

By Michael Doyle | McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON _ The Supreme Court on Monday struck down California’s ban on the slaughter of downed swine, saying the state law strayed too far into federal territory.

In a case closely watched by other states as well as the multibillion-dollar livestock industry, the court unanimously ruled that longstanding federal law pre-empted California’s 2008 measure.

“The California law runs smack into the (federal) regulations,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the court. Kagan’s 14-page decision emphasized that the Federal Meat Inspection Act covers a “broad range of activities at slaughterhouses” and that it “expressly” pre-empts the state law.

The California law in question prohibits the slaughter of non-ambulatory pigs, sheep, goats or cattle. These are animals that can't walk because of disease, injury or other causes. The state law further requires that the downed animals be euthanized.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/01/23/136642/supreme-court-federal-meat-inspection.html#storylink=omni_popular?du

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Supreme Court says no to ...