Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
1. Sometimes inaccuartely referred to as "camoflage" paint schemes
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 04:53 PM
Jul 2014

They were not intended to hide, because a ship at sea cannot be hidden. They were enormously successufl at obscuring the "angle on the bow" used in targeting calculations for torpedos and, to a lesser extent, for naval artillery.

The angle on the bow is not quite the same thing as the "course," but is a measure of the target's angle relative to the shooting ship, and is used to determine the rate at which the range and bearing will be changing. The target's course is determined by a series of "plots" on the chart, while the angle on the bow is a visual extimate and is a "snapshot" of it's status at a given moment.

Similar paint schemes were still in use throughout WW2 as well.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»The painted warships of W...»Reply #1