Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

Showing Original Post only (View all)

WhoIsNumberNone

(7,875 posts)
Sun Apr 14, 2013, 12:10 PM Apr 2013

Rep. Michele Bachmann Completely Baffles John Brennan With Bizarre Questions During CIA Hearing [View all]



Representatives from the CIA, including newly-installed Director John Brennan, didn't quite know what to make of Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) this week when they sat down to answer questions from the House Intelligence Committee. Each topic she raised seemed to draw blank stares and more questions from the intelligence officials, who could not believe the congresswoman was broaching various classified subject in the open forum.First off, Bachmann brought up one of her favorite topics, the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi in September 2012. She wanted to know about the White House's "armed drone strikes" in eastern Libya prior to those attacks last year.
"Armed drone strikes in Libya?" Brennan asked in seeming disbelief. "I am unknowing of such and would defer to the White House to address your question." When she pushed him on the issue, Brennan asserted that "the White House doesn't have a drone capability, responsibility" and said "I don't know what it is specifically you're referring to."When she failed to get the answers she was looking for, Bachmann said, "well if we aren't going to talk about that, we aren't going to talk about that, but that's a question I'd like to know." She moved on, asking Brennan "what is our red line regarding the Iranian nuclear development program?""That clearly is a policy question," Brennan responded, explaining to Bachmann why he's not the right person to answer that question. From there, Bachmann went off on a tangent about the various times the United States and U.S. interests have been attacked over the last few decades, expressing her concern that an Iranian nuclear attack could also come as a surprise.
But the most bizarre moment came at the end of Bachmann's time when she asked about Iran's "heavy water reactor." The CIA men conferred amongst themselves for several seconds before politely informing Bachmann that it would be better to have that discussion in a "closed session."
It's not entirely clear whether Bachmann thought she would be able to extract classified information live on C-SPAN from Brennan and his CIA colleagues, or if she was just using her platform on the committee to air some of things on the international stage that have been bugging her. Either way, it was likely one of the strangest interactions between Congress and the CIA ever caught on camera.

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
bizarre-Bachmann Flashmann Apr 2013 #1
Normally I insist on referring to her merely as 'BSC', but it refuses to catch on... WhoIsNumberNone Apr 2013 #2
ditz leftyohiolib Apr 2013 #3
Wow! brucefan Apr 2013 #4
Its time for Mr. Bachmann's beard to just go away already... Moostache Apr 2013 #5
In 2004 I actually tried to start a death pool- WhoIsNumberNone Apr 2013 #6
Michelle Bachmann is insane... hue Apr 2013 #7
The Tyrell Corporation doesn't make 'em like they used to. shenmue Apr 2013 #8
Outsourcing to the lowest bidder usually means crap for a product, full of glitches. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #19
A teabagging lunatic vs a former Bush torture supporter whose presence in the MotherPetrie Apr 2013 #9
Amen to that. abq e streeter Apr 2013 #11
"I look forward to that"... awoke_in_2003 Apr 2013 #10
She's an incredibly uninformed questioner and it clearly shows. Poll_Blind Apr 2013 #12
Problem is she can't keep her staff. They keep quitting. dmr Apr 2013 #17
So we are charging Maning with aiding the enemy PatrynXX Apr 2013 #13
Cops have plenty of ammo they just need to shoot less. oldbanjo Apr 2013 #37
Okay. I just wasted 4min and 28 seconds of my life. FourScore Apr 2013 #14
Actually, US & NATO were flying armed drones in Libya before Benghazi. Question isn't so bizarre. leveymg Apr 2013 #15
The only really crazy segment was the part about, bvar22 Apr 2013 #18
I thought that was the most bizarre part, also. maddiemom Apr 2013 #21
She's referring to 9/11/12 - the date of the Benghazi attack, not 9/11/01. leveymg Apr 2013 #23
Oops! Got it. bvar22 Apr 2013 #24
Bizarro Bachmann is a "Heavy Water" Addict tout_le_monde Apr 2013 #16
She really tries to appear inteligent... AsahinaKimi Apr 2013 #20
Bachnman loves to keep her face in front of a camera. Wellstone ruled Apr 2013 #22
It amazes me that Bachmann still has a Security Clearance. formercia Apr 2013 #25
My thoughts and furthermore why is Boehner allowing her to remain on this committee Thinkingabout Apr 2013 #26
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #27
She seemed very robotic to me...almost drugged Iwillnevergiveup Apr 2013 #28
Cosmetics counter in a drugstore. EOM cartach Apr 2013 #30
Amazingly stupid.lol SummerSnow Apr 2013 #29
The White House doesn't micro-manage the military. Next, she is asking about highly classified RBInMaine Apr 2013 #31
How did Michelle Bachmann get on that committee? JDPriestly Apr 2013 #32
A wise man once said EvolveOrConvolve Apr 2013 #33
MICHELE IS SO BIZARRE, SHE QUICKLY CROSSES FUNNY AND CHARGES INTO drynberg Apr 2013 #34
She is such an embarrassment to our country and the people of Minnesota. Quixote1818 Apr 2013 #35
I'm bet most rightwingers look at this the way we look at Elizabeth Warren grilling bank regulators Douglas Carpenter Apr 2013 #36
Bachmann is such a fool. blackspade Apr 2013 #38
Earth to Bachmann.... Earth to Bachmann zebonaut Apr 2013 #39
??? heaven05 Apr 2013 #40
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Rep. Michele Bachmann Com...»Reply #0