Video & Multimedia

thucythucy

(9,064 posts)

30. So the police could be certain no one was about to take a shot at them?

Reply to limpyhobbler (Reply #26)

Sun Apr 21, 2013, 01:35 PM

Apr 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

90 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'm not okay with this. [View all] TalkingDog Apr 2013 OP

Then you need to grow up. gcomeau Apr 2013 #1

People who see nothing wrong with this whatsoever, frighten me as much as the actual loss Fire Walk With Me Apr 2013 #9

You're clueless. gcomeau Apr 2013 #11

When did they make this up? zeemike Apr 2013 #21

A very long time ago. gcomeau Apr 2013 #37

Well I was born in 43 and grew up in the 50s zeemike Apr 2013 #51

Exactly. blackspade Apr 2013 #66

You might want to ask some Japanese people on the west coast Mr.Bill Apr 2013 #71

Or back to Lincoln suspending habeas corpus. zeemike Apr 2013 #72

Never would've happened in your youth? IrishAyes Apr 2013 #81

Suppose you give us an example of it then. zeemike Apr 2013 #84

Since you don't want to listen to reason IrishAyes Apr 2013 #86

Bloodthirsty felons....now I am really scared. zeemike Apr 2013 #87

You're only interested in stirring the pot, so you're wasting everybody's time. Thru w/u IrishAyes Apr 2013 #88

Don't you see those people are being pulled out of their house to protect them from themselves. limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #25

Or they could be held against their will itsrobert Apr 2013 #69

I feel the same way. nt Mojorabbit Apr 2013 #57

Sure doesn't look like the police asked nicely for cooperation in finding a terrorist. 1monster Apr 2013 #45

I refer you... gcomeau Apr 2013 #50

And YOUR first-hand experience? Please, do tell us. 1monster Apr 2013 #52

I'm not referring to my reaction am I? gcomeau Apr 2013 #53

Evasion. As expected. 1monster Apr 2013 #55

Oh, now I get it, MONSTER IrishAyes Apr 2013 #83

On one of my trips to London several years ago, avebury Apr 2013 #68

And exactly how do you know IrishAyes Apr 2013 #82

This message was self-deleted by its author DeSwiss Apr 2013 #64

If that guy was in YOUR house CountAllVotes Apr 2013 #2

Yep, you are right. But he couldn't be in every premises. They performed a lot of illegal searches. TalkingDog Apr 2013 #3

They performed exactly ZERO illegal searches. gcomeau Apr 2013 #8

citation please? blackspade Apr 2013 #67

Well you better get OK with it. zeemike Apr 2013 #13

When you don't know which house he's in you have to search all of them. Kablooie Apr 2013 #54

What are you hiding? TheCowsCameHome Apr 2013 #4

Evidently everybody is harboring a criminal or is a criminal. Just going with the crowd. TalkingDog Apr 2013 #5

Until they found him, he could have been anywhere in that area. TheCowsCameHome Apr 2013 #7

What did they do at houses with no answer? ret5hd Apr 2013 #23

Went in of course. gcomeau Apr 2013 #39

So they kicked the door in, etc, to get inside? ret5hd Apr 2013 #46

If they had to I assume so. gcomeau Apr 2013 #49

I heard differently. Are you sure? ret5hd Apr 2013 #56

Welcome to the police state of America. James48 Apr 2013 #6

Exigent circumstances/hot pursuit. gcomeau Apr 2013 #10

Bingo! n/t Still Sensible Apr 2013 #14

I'd say that with someone as dangerous as the bomber on the loose in the hood... Triana Apr 2013 #73

This incident is providing lots of video for the paranoid "New World Order" gun nuts. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #15

Ah, but we knew damn well it was NOT "unreasonable" search. It was reasonable and FailureToCommunicate Apr 2013 #22

The reality is that the cops are well-intentioned individuals trying to protect their community El Fuego Apr 2013 #90

It's only going to get worse. limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #12

This is a "house to house search".... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #17

Why did they have to leave their house? limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #18

For their own safety if there's a firefight. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #24

Then why do they have to put their hands over their heads? limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #26

So the police could be certain no one was about to take a shot at them? thucythucy Apr 2013 #30

The guy must have had an attitude. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #32

I wonder why? limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #33

Watch it again and count the number of people that come out. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #35

Why ? limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #40

It may be a college flop house. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #43

Maybe it was a baby shower. limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #48

Hey! Just because the one guy had a pot belly is no reason to get nasty! Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #59

Mea Culpa. Evidently this is legal. But I still find the process objectionable. TalkingDog Apr 2013 #16

Glad you are open to rethinking this. Of course it was objectionable. None of us wanted lots of FailureToCommunicate Apr 2013 #34

Neither am I. ret5hd Apr 2013 #19

Sadly, more people seem to be ok with that. dixiegrrrrl Apr 2013 #20

These days Anne Frank would be Tweeting. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #29

A little context would help. thucythucy Apr 2013 #27

"A little context would help." Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #31

Hard to know, since I wasn't there. thucythucy Apr 2013 #38

They didn't come to the door right away and the place was packed with people.... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #42

Yeah, I'm sure after three civilians dead thucythucy Apr 2013 #44

Okay,...THAT was funny. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #47

Indeed. agracie Apr 2013 #74

or flushing their drugs down the toilet. thesquanderer Apr 2013 #70

I guess it depends on the nature of the illegal activity.... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #75

+1 FailureToCommunicate Apr 2013 #36

Neither am I Xithras Apr 2013 #28

Unpleasant, yes. Scary, yes. Is the town safe now, YES! Kablooie Apr 2013 #41

They act like the people in that house are all guilty of something. I dunno I am southernyankeebelle Apr 2013 #58

Legal or not, this house was raided, not searched. rocktivity Apr 2013 #60

I guess we've identified the new DU obsession. Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #61

this week heaven05 Apr 2013 #62

This message was self-deleted by its author DeSwiss Apr 2013 #63

Me neither blackspade Apr 2013 #65

Do you remember a little somthing called the "Patriot Act?" VPStoltz Apr 2013 #76

BS. darkangel218 Apr 2013 #80

Should hear all sides first treestar Apr 2013 #77

but didnt you hear.. iamthebandfanman Apr 2013 #78

So you would rather risk being blown up by terrorists darkangel218 Apr 2013 #79

And God forbid if the police IrishAyes Apr 2013 #85

Thank you for posting that, I was going to, but wanted to check to see if others had. Trillo Apr 2013 #89