Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

In reply to the discussion: I'm not okay with this. [View all]

IrishAyes

(6,151 posts)
85. And God forbid if the police
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 11:17 PM
Apr 2013

were not laid back and casual enough to suit someone else that they were being polite enough. If you've had any experience with emergencies and crowd control, you know command pitch is called for.

Working in healthcare for quite a few years, I saw some emergencies myself, and people usually told me later that they had no idea I could bark orders like a drill sergeant, because I'm a tiny little woman and usually so soft spoken. But honey doesn't work in those situations. You have to command and mean it, not give contrarians time to stand around and quibble until all is lost.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm not okay with this. [View all] TalkingDog Apr 2013 OP
Then you need to grow up. gcomeau Apr 2013 #1
People who see nothing wrong with this whatsoever, frighten me as much as the actual loss Fire Walk With Me Apr 2013 #9
You're clueless. gcomeau Apr 2013 #11
When did they make this up? zeemike Apr 2013 #21
A very long time ago. gcomeau Apr 2013 #37
Well I was born in 43 and grew up in the 50s zeemike Apr 2013 #51
Exactly. blackspade Apr 2013 #66
You might want to ask some Japanese people on the west coast Mr.Bill Apr 2013 #71
Or back to Lincoln suspending habeas corpus. zeemike Apr 2013 #72
Never would've happened in your youth? IrishAyes Apr 2013 #81
Suppose you give us an example of it then. zeemike Apr 2013 #84
Since you don't want to listen to reason IrishAyes Apr 2013 #86
Bloodthirsty felons....now I am really scared. zeemike Apr 2013 #87
You're only interested in stirring the pot, so you're wasting everybody's time. Thru w/u IrishAyes Apr 2013 #88
Don't you see those people are being pulled out of their house to protect them from themselves. limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #25
Or they could be held against their will itsrobert Apr 2013 #69
I feel the same way. nt Mojorabbit Apr 2013 #57
Sure doesn't look like the police asked nicely for cooperation in finding a terrorist. 1monster Apr 2013 #45
I refer you... gcomeau Apr 2013 #50
And YOUR first-hand experience? Please, do tell us. 1monster Apr 2013 #52
I'm not referring to my reaction am I? gcomeau Apr 2013 #53
Evasion. As expected. 1monster Apr 2013 #55
Oh, now I get it, MONSTER IrishAyes Apr 2013 #83
On one of my trips to London several years ago, avebury Apr 2013 #68
And exactly how do you know IrishAyes Apr 2013 #82
This message was self-deleted by its author DeSwiss Apr 2013 #64
If that guy was in YOUR house CountAllVotes Apr 2013 #2
Yep, you are right. But he couldn't be in every premises. They performed a lot of illegal searches. TalkingDog Apr 2013 #3
They performed exactly ZERO illegal searches. gcomeau Apr 2013 #8
citation please? blackspade Apr 2013 #67
Well you better get OK with it. zeemike Apr 2013 #13
When you don't know which house he's in you have to search all of them. Kablooie Apr 2013 #54
What are you hiding? TheCowsCameHome Apr 2013 #4
Evidently everybody is harboring a criminal or is a criminal. Just going with the crowd. TalkingDog Apr 2013 #5
Until they found him, he could have been anywhere in that area. TheCowsCameHome Apr 2013 #7
What did they do at houses with no answer? ret5hd Apr 2013 #23
Went in of course. gcomeau Apr 2013 #39
So they kicked the door in, etc, to get inside? ret5hd Apr 2013 #46
If they had to I assume so. gcomeau Apr 2013 #49
I heard differently. Are you sure? ret5hd Apr 2013 #56
Welcome to the police state of America. James48 Apr 2013 #6
Exigent circumstances/hot pursuit. gcomeau Apr 2013 #10
Bingo! n/t Still Sensible Apr 2013 #14
I'd say that with someone as dangerous as the bomber on the loose in the hood... Triana Apr 2013 #73
This incident is providing lots of video for the paranoid "New World Order" gun nuts. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #15
Ah, but we knew damn well it was NOT "unreasonable" search. It was reasonable and FailureToCommunicate Apr 2013 #22
The reality is that the cops are well-intentioned individuals trying to protect their community El Fuego Apr 2013 #90
It's only going to get worse. limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #12
This is a "house to house search".... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #17
Why did they have to leave their house? limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #18
For their own safety if there's a firefight. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #24
Then why do they have to put their hands over their heads? limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #26
So the police could be certain no one was about to take a shot at them? thucythucy Apr 2013 #30
The guy must have had an attitude. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #32
I wonder why? limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #33
Watch it again and count the number of people that come out. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #35
Why ? limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #40
It may be a college flop house. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #43
Maybe it was a baby shower. limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #48
Hey! Just because the one guy had a pot belly is no reason to get nasty! Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #59
Mea Culpa. Evidently this is legal. But I still find the process objectionable. TalkingDog Apr 2013 #16
Glad you are open to rethinking this. Of course it was objectionable. None of us wanted lots of FailureToCommunicate Apr 2013 #34
Neither am I. ret5hd Apr 2013 #19
Sadly, more people seem to be ok with that. dixiegrrrrl Apr 2013 #20
These days Anne Frank would be Tweeting. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #29
A little context would help. thucythucy Apr 2013 #27
"A little context would help." Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #31
Hard to know, since I wasn't there. thucythucy Apr 2013 #38
They didn't come to the door right away and the place was packed with people.... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #42
Yeah, I'm sure after three civilians dead thucythucy Apr 2013 #44
Okay,...THAT was funny. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #47
Indeed. agracie Apr 2013 #74
or flushing their drugs down the toilet. thesquanderer Apr 2013 #70
I guess it depends on the nature of the illegal activity.... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #75
+1 FailureToCommunicate Apr 2013 #36
Neither am I Xithras Apr 2013 #28
Unpleasant, yes. Scary, yes. Is the town safe now, YES! Kablooie Apr 2013 #41
They act like the people in that house are all guilty of something. I dunno I am southernyankeebelle Apr 2013 #58
Legal or not, this house was raided, not searched. rocktivity Apr 2013 #60
I guess we've identified the new DU obsession. Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #61
this week heaven05 Apr 2013 #62
This message was self-deleted by its author DeSwiss Apr 2013 #63
Me neither blackspade Apr 2013 #65
Do you remember a little somthing called the "Patriot Act?" VPStoltz Apr 2013 #76
BS. darkangel218 Apr 2013 #80
Should hear all sides first treestar Apr 2013 #77
but didnt you hear.. iamthebandfanman Apr 2013 #78
So you would rather risk being blown up by terrorists darkangel218 Apr 2013 #79
And God forbid if the police IrishAyes Apr 2013 #85
Thank you for posting that, I was going to, but wanted to check to see if others had. Trillo Apr 2013 #89
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»I'm not okay with this.»Reply #85