Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)

27. Nah, I'm not going back to old posts.

Reply to jjewell (Reply #26)

Sun May 5, 2013, 04:45 PM

May 2013

If you wish to raise a question with me, go ahead.

You missed the point of the dangers of guns being available to 5 year olds.

By the way, not only are 5 year olds not infants, they are not even toddlers anymore.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Piers Morgan Clashes With Ben Ferguson Over Background Checks, Infants Getting Their Hands On Guns [View all] Tx4obama May 2013 OP

"...five-year-old infant..."? Jenoch May 2013 #1

The boy was given a gun when he was 4 years old. Related article below Tx4obama May 2013 #2

Of course guns should be locked up Jenoch May 2013 #3

Focusing on the word "infant"... jjewell May 2013 #4

Words have meaning. Jenoch May 2013 #5

That "weak-sister" background check bill... jjewell May 2013 #6

The tragedy did not happen Jenoch May 2013 #7

Must be a difference in upbringing... jjewell May 2013 #8

No. You are completely wrong. Jenoch May 2013 #9

Please don't play stupid... jjewell May 2013 #10

Exactly how much harm Jenoch May 2013 #11

Why don't YOU... jjewell May 2013 #13

On anorher thread I described how Jenoch May 2013 #12

Number one, how... jjewell May 2013 #14

First, and this is not imlortant to the discussian, Jenoch May 2013 #15

First, neither does the age... jjewell May 2013 #16

As long as you are bringing it up, Jenoch May 2013 #17

I thought YOU said... jjewell May 2013 #18

Right back at you. Jenoch May 2013 #19

The point is, YOU brought up baptism... jjewell May 2013 #20

Again, I didn't bring it up in the religious context, but about age, INFANT. Jenoch May 2013 #21

Pointless distraction from the issue and question remains your game, I see... jjewell May 2013 #22

The issue is a 5-year old having Jenoch May 2013 #23

No. The issue is "gifting" a five year old with a deadly weapon in the first place. jjewell May 2013 #24

You are so focused Jenoch May 2013 #25

You are so focused on dodging the point.... jjewell May 2013 #26

Nah, I'm not going back to old posts. Jenoch May 2013 #27

Okay... jjewell May 2013 #28

Sure the guns are theirs. Jenoch May 2013 #29

Oh brother... here we go again... jjewell May 2013 #30

Wow, are you dense. Jenoch May 2013 #31

Calling me "obtuse" and "dense" gains you no credibility, and scores you no points... jjewell May 2013 #32

You are correct. Jenoch May 2013 #33

Very cool. Let the debate continue... jjewell May 2013 #34

1.) I probably should not have Jenoch May 2013 #35

Finally, a decent, cogent, conversational response from you, Jenoch... jjewell May 2013 #36

Actually, Jenoch May 2013 #37

Oh... I thought you said there is no point in continued debate on this matter... jjewell May 2013 #38

I agree that the gun being available Jenoch May 2013 #39

Of course the 2 year old wouldn't be dead if the gun... jjewell May 2013 #40

It is only Jenoch May 2013 #41

Being the paragon of virtue that you apparently are... jjewell May 2013 #42

What is insane Jenoch May 2013 #43