Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

davidthegnome

(2,983 posts)
22. The content of his ideas?
Sun May 5, 2013, 11:15 PM
May 2013

That the US is a top terrorist state? Our government and government agencies do a number of things internationally that I find despicable, most of us here find them entirely despicable. For this supposed intellectual though, to compare us to suicide bombers, or to fanatics who would have everyone in the world live under Sharia law or perish - is ridiculous. Generally, when someone who is hailed as a great intellectual has something to say, you might expect it to be at least moderately intelligent.

I have watched Chomsky videos in the past, they are long on rhetoric and ramble but short on anything that is actually useful. He is a celebrity in much the same way that many rich and useless people are celebrities, the difference being that he is a celebrity because he is some kind of (supposed) intellectual giant. Am I supposed to be impressed that this guy can come up with rhetoric that is very much akin to what you might expect from Alex Jones?

It is implied, endlessly here, that no one has the right to dissent. This can be recognized from the fact that any time someone does, or has the nerve to say something unkind about Mr. Chomsky, there is a devoted fan base here that jumps down their throat. It would be cute if it wasn't so annoying.

Will you tell me that he is NOT a grand intellectual? No? Well then, perhaps my baseless attack on his character is an effort to convince people to think for themselves, without the need for grand intellectuals to do it for them. In any event, I am hereby exercising my right to dissent.

And my right to yawn, and to go to bed. Goodnight.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ah, Chomsky! Newest Reality May 2013 #1
I miss Howard Zinn who I give tribute to along with Chomsky. L0oniX May 2013 #7
Excellent post. blackspade May 2013 #19
Well... greytdemocrat May 2013 #2
Yep. davidthegnome May 2013 #3
I'm sure Albert's x wife would disagree a bit. L0oniX May 2013 #8
By All Means liberalmike27 May 2013 #11
Sorry but, extreme arrogance davidthegnome May 2013 #13
Damn all those arrogant scientists, too radiclib May 2013 #14
Way to entirely miss the point. davidthegnome May 2013 #17
You got that right radiclib May 2013 #21
The content of his ideas? davidthegnome May 2013 #22
Now that you've finally gone beyond mere personal insults radiclib May 2013 #30
Extreme arragance is believing lies instead of the truth. You seem to have his backwards. Coyotl May 2013 #15
Perhaps from people who are highly intelligent... davidthegnome May 2013 #18
Arrogance? SitchaChante May 2013 #24
Thank you and welcome to DU, SitchaChante. dotymed May 2013 #31
The truth does often hurt. davidthegnome May 2013 #34
Welcome to DU my friend! hrmjustin May 2013 #35
Your still presenting a failed ad hominem attack. grahamhgreen May 2013 #26
Chomsky, to me, is not Newest Reality May 2013 #12
+1000 blackspade May 2013 #20
That applies to you too, I suppose Coyotl May 2013 #4
The arguer, being or not being sulphurdunn May 2013 #6
But at least we Turbineguy May 2013 #5
US insurance corporations ARE terrorists. n/t L0oniX May 2013 #9
Noam Chomsky hits the nail on its head by realizing terrorist acts by a righteous superpower indepat May 2013 #10
^^^^^^ THIS ^^^^^^^ +1000000000000000 Coyotl May 2013 #16
We are not a terrorist state treestar May 2013 #23
No, we just start wars based on lies and kill a lot of people, shock and awe and all that Coyotl May 2013 #25
The Afghanistan war was not based on a lie treestar May 2013 #28
But we do torture, so that makes us a.... grahamhgreen May 2013 #27
We don't torture at this time treestar May 2013 #29
Not true. Failure to prosecute for the crime of torture means that torture is available for use, grahamhgreen May 2013 #32
he said, hopefully. Coyotl May 2013 #33
War and the threat of war is terror. usGovOwesUs3Trillion May 2013 #36
Somehow we beat Germany, Japan treestar May 2013 #37
and usGovOwesUs3Trillion May 2013 #38
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Noam Chomsky: US, a Top T...»Reply #22