Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
6. LMAO!
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:05 PM
Jun 2013
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The question wasn't propaganda. Greenwald is an arrogant jerk. Now he will be releasing still_one Jun 2013 #1
Yeah, He Didn't "Destroy" MSNBC..... Grassy Knoll Jun 2013 #3
It says a lot about you that you choose to side with Mika a conservative over Mr. Greenwald and rhett o rick Jun 2013 #13
Awww, Raspberries, Love em ! Grassy Knoll Jun 2013 #16
"Mika a conservative over Mr. Greenwald " grantcart Jun 2013 #39
Mika treated Mr. Greenwald as a hostile witness and not like a guest. rhett o rick Jun 2013 #40
I wouldn't bother to waste my time with either Mika or Greenwald on tape. I will read Greenwald but grantcart Jun 2013 #42
I disagree with your "facts" as you laid them out. Apparently you approve of her attempts rhett o rick Jun 2013 #43
Its your facts that have no basis in reality grantcart Jun 2013 #45
All messingers are arogrant jerks zeemike Jun 2013 #8
Calling Mr. Greenwald names is childish and a poor attempt to distract from the issue. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #12
I call it as I see it, you call it as you see it. Simple as that. The simple fact is it was legal. still_one Jun 2013 #15
SPOT ON!!!! DaDeacon Jun 2013 #20
"The simple fact is that it was legal" whathehell Jun 2013 #25
Some people might find the way you think rather truedelphi Jun 2013 #27
Exactly. whathehell Jun 2013 #28
The fact that something of this nature can even be deemed "Legal" NorthCarolina Jun 2013 #32
I keep hearing that argument nineteen50 Jun 2013 #33
And you know it's "legal" how? There seems to be some question but apparently rhett o rick Jun 2013 #44
Right wing tools focus on the individuals' personalities to distract from the NSA abuses. limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #2
I'm grateful for moments like this when people clearly show which side they're on Catherina Jun 2013 #7
Lets, see I state an personal view, and you say I am a right-wing tool because you don't like it. still_one Jun 2013 #17
I wasn't talking to you. limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #35
Awe, ad-homineming like Greenwald railsback Jun 2013 #26
LOL nah bye nt limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #36
Greenwald calling people questioning his 'reporting' 'WH cronies' railsback Jun 2013 #41
Destroyed?? MikeDE Jun 2013 #4
Welcome to DU. GeorgeGist Jun 2013 #5
LMAO! Catherina Jun 2013 #6
Cool story! Iggo Jun 2013 #9
it's a non-story, that's why the establishment and their apologizers.. frylock Jun 2013 #11
no one is "crapping" their pants. This IS an old story, that is a fact, not an apology. The still_one Jun 2013 #18
Quite a few attempts have been made to amend the Patriot Act. Laelth Jun 2013 #30
shitting. their. pants. frylock Jun 2013 #37
DU is for "liberal thinking people", are you sure you are in the correct place? rhett o rick Jun 2013 #14
So are you saying if someone does not care for mr. greewald, they are not "liberal thinking"? still_one Jun 2013 #19
No what I am saying is that calling him names is childish. It means you probably have nothing rhett o rick Jun 2013 #21
Not to your discussion still_one Jun 2013 #22
Why are you so afraid of looking deeper into this issue? Are you afraid of what daylight may bring? rhett o rick Jun 2013 #23
I am not afraid, but I do not like greenwald, and it was long before this that I made my mind up still_one Jun 2013 #24
It has been around for years nineteen50 Jun 2013 #34
I don't know if he destroyed them - but he did put up a solid and vigorous argument Douglas Carpenter Jun 2013 #10
k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Jun 2013 #29
Greenwald owned the show MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #31
Glenn is very well-spoken navarth Jun 2013 #38
What's with Scarborough constantly clearing his throat? WhoIsNumberNone Jun 2013 #46
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Glenn Greenwald Destroys ...»Reply #6