Video & Multimedia

Iggo

(49,927 posts)

9. Cool story!

Reply to MikeDE (Reply #4)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:22 PM

Jun 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Glenn Greenwald Destroys MSNBC's Attempted Propaganda [View all] Catherina Jun 2013 OP

The question wasn't propaganda. Greenwald is an arrogant jerk. Now he will be releasing still_one Jun 2013 #1

Yeah, He Didn't "Destroy" MSNBC..... Grassy Knoll Jun 2013 #3

It says a lot about you that you choose to side with Mika a conservative over Mr. Greenwald and rhett o rick Jun 2013 #13

Awww, Raspberries, Love em ! Grassy Knoll Jun 2013 #16

"Mika a conservative over Mr. Greenwald " grantcart Jun 2013 #39

Mika treated Mr. Greenwald as a hostile witness and not like a guest. rhett o rick Jun 2013 #40

I wouldn't bother to waste my time with either Mika or Greenwald on tape. I will read Greenwald but grantcart Jun 2013 #42

I disagree with your "facts" as you laid them out. Apparently you approve of her attempts rhett o rick Jun 2013 #43

Its your facts that have no basis in reality grantcart Jun 2013 #45

All messingers are arogrant jerks zeemike Jun 2013 #8

Calling Mr. Greenwald names is childish and a poor attempt to distract from the issue. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #12

I call it as I see it, you call it as you see it. Simple as that. The simple fact is it was legal. still_one Jun 2013 #15

SPOT ON!!!! DaDeacon Jun 2013 #20

"The simple fact is that it was legal" whathehell Jun 2013 #25

Some people might find the way you think rather truedelphi Jun 2013 #27

Exactly. whathehell Jun 2013 #28

The fact that something of this nature can even be deemed "Legal" NorthCarolina Jun 2013 #32

I keep hearing that argument nineteen50 Jun 2013 #33

And you know it's "legal" how? There seems to be some question but apparently rhett o rick Jun 2013 #44

Right wing tools focus on the individuals' personalities to distract from the NSA abuses. limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #2

I'm grateful for moments like this when people clearly show which side they're on Catherina Jun 2013 #7

Lets, see I state an personal view, and you say I am a right-wing tool because you don't like it. still_one Jun 2013 #17

I wasn't talking to you. limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #35

Awe, ad-homineming like Greenwald railsback Jun 2013 #26

LOL nah bye nt limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #36

Greenwald calling people questioning his 'reporting' 'WH cronies' railsback Jun 2013 #41

Destroyed?? MikeDE Jun 2013 #4

Welcome to DU. GeorgeGist Jun 2013 #5

LMAO! Catherina Jun 2013 #6

Cool story! Iggo Jun 2013 #9

it's a non-story, that's why the establishment and their apologizers.. frylock Jun 2013 #11

no one is "crapping" their pants. This IS an old story, that is a fact, not an apology. The still_one Jun 2013 #18

Quite a few attempts have been made to amend the Patriot Act. Laelth Jun 2013 #30

shitting. their. pants. frylock Jun 2013 #37

DU is for "liberal thinking people", are you sure you are in the correct place? rhett o rick Jun 2013 #14

So are you saying if someone does not care for mr. greewald, they are not "liberal thinking"? still_one Jun 2013 #19

No what I am saying is that calling him names is childish. It means you probably have nothing rhett o rick Jun 2013 #21

Not to your discussion still_one Jun 2013 #22

Why are you so afraid of looking deeper into this issue? Are you afraid of what daylight may bring? rhett o rick Jun 2013 #23

I am not afraid, but I do not like greenwald, and it was long before this that I made my mind up still_one Jun 2013 #24

It has been around for years nineteen50 Jun 2013 #34

I don't know if he destroyed them - but he did put up a solid and vigorous argument Douglas Carpenter Jun 2013 #10

k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Jun 2013 #29

Greenwald owned the show MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #31

Glenn is very well-spoken navarth Jun 2013 #38

What's with Scarborough constantly clearing his throat? WhoIsNumberNone Jun 2013 #46