Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
21. Oh, please... talk about saying things that are NOT true...
Thu Aug 8, 2013, 07:05 AM
Aug 2013

This is what she said in PRINT, since LO's infantile rant basically can't be distinguished from O'Reilly's yelling ...

Vladimir Putin is not omnipotent. He does not control everything that happens in the Russian Federation, a vast and often inhospitable landmass that spans 10 time zones.

Similarly, Barack Obama does not have total control over the minutiae of the United States of America.

Putin does not orchestrate, he reacts. Putin is no chess player. He is a knee-jerk, short-sighted little tyrant. Don't give him credit where credit isn't due.

Americans, especially Americans who have never been to Russia, overestimate the abilities of both Putin and the Russians. Because, I mean, come on. Tank!

The Russians did not create the Snowden situation; Julian Assange and the U.S. government did. Assange insinuated himself into the situation and sent Snowden to Ecuador (the country granting him asylum) through Russia (his great friend).

The Obama administration trapped Snowden in Russia. The U.S. unsealed the charges before it had Snowden in custody, revoked his passport, then downed the plane of the president of a sovereign state over other sovereign states because it thought Snowden was on board. The only place, by design, where Snowden could go was back to the U.S. Where he was charged with espionage, for which the maximum punishent is death.

Russia is a brutal place where whistleblowers are harassed and killed, but Russia, unlike the U.S., has no death penalty. And it is only because the Russians made a stink about it, that Eric Holder was forced to come out and assure the Russians that Edward Snowden won't be put to death. This happened over a month after Snowden's arrival in Moscow, and after the charges of espionage were unsealed.

If a Russian Edward Snowden ended up in JFK Airport, there is no way in hell we'd turn him over to the Russians. Not in a hundred years, and not ever.

You can't back Putin into a corner and leave him no options. If you are a world leader worth your salt, and have a good diplomatic team working for you, you would know that. You would also know that when dealing with thugs like Putin, you know that things like this are better handled quietly. Here's the thing: Putin responds to shows of strength, but only if he has room to maneuver. You can't publicly shame him into doing something, it's not going to get a good response. Just like it would not get a good response out of Obama.

The Obama administration totally fucked this up. I mean, totally. Soup to nuts. Remember the spy exchange in the summer of 2010? Ten Russian sleeper agents—which is not what Snowden is—were uncovered by the FBI in the U.S. Instead of kicking up a massive, public stink over it, the Kremlin and the White House arranged for their silent transfer to Russia in exchange for four people accused in Russia of spying for the U.S. Two planes landed on the tarmac in Vienna, ten people went one way, four people went the other way, the planes flew off, and that was it. That's how this should have been done if the U.S. really wanted Snowden back.

However, the decision to blow off the Moscow summit was a good one. See yesterday's post.

I am not a Putin apologist. I think he and his people do bad things, like kill people and fleece the country for its wealth. But neither do I think he's oppressing the Russian masses. He is their most extreme and natural, their most post-Soviet manifestation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is part of the reason I'm not completely comfortable with Larry O. He's still a WH flack if leveymg Aug 2013 #1
Yep. Marr Aug 2013 #2
He works for MSNBC Quantess Aug 2013 #20
There's no doubt that is the policy laid down by MSNBC suits leveymg Aug 2013 #24
Very sad Timma Aug 2013 #3
yup Pharaoh Aug 2013 #4
she sounds like an idiot JI7 Aug 2013 #5
I agree. O'Donnell won the argument/debate by a landslide. Tx4obama Aug 2013 #6
Of course Timma Aug 2013 #10
She was unprepared and did not know the facts. Tx4obama Aug 2013 #11
Yeah, just because she worked in Russia doesn't mean she knows more that Lawrence... CtDemoFarmer Aug 2013 #31
That wasn't her point NoMoreWarNow Aug 2013 #34
Agreed harrylimelives999 Aug 2013 #7
That wasn't her point at all. NoMoreWarNow Aug 2013 #35
Yeah, just look at Manning Life Long Dem Aug 2013 #40
Fascinating to see how Snowden has become the splinter in the Progressive Movement SleeplessinSoCal Aug 2013 #8
Geez, she kept saying we "downed" the Bolivian plane... SunSeeker Aug 2013 #9
Wrong Timma Aug 2013 #12
No, naive is suggesting Putin does not control media his government OWNS. SunSeeker Aug 2013 #13
The network suits do have 100% control over hirings and firings, if not content. e.g., Olberman leveymg Aug 2013 #25
Her beautiful smackdown response Timma Aug 2013 #14
She is digging herself a deeper hole by saying more things that are NOT true. Tx4obama Aug 2013 #15
No kidding. Like her assertion that Putin is not oppressing... SunSeeker Aug 2013 #16
Sure, everything's huky dory... so long as we don't count those oppressed 'gay masses.' nt MADem Aug 2013 #17
or journalists or democratic activists or anyone who disagrees with him...nt SunSeeker Aug 2013 #18
is that an actual quote from her ? JI7 Aug 2013 #19
Yes--her written "response" to O'Donnell in New Republic. nt SunSeeker Aug 2013 #42
Oh, please... talk about saying things that are NOT true... MrMickeysMom Aug 2013 #21
This one ^^^^^^^^^^^ leveymg Aug 2013 #27
yeah, that was good. NoMoreWarNow Aug 2013 #37
"The Last Word" Indeed freedom fighter jh Aug 2013 #22
Odonnel is a lousy Madmiddle Aug 2013 #23
Larence O reallly turned me OFF. He acted like a jerk. He reminded bonniebgood Aug 2013 #26
Stop being naive, people. Benton D Struckcheon Aug 2013 #28
This is why I love Lawrence O Evergreen Emerald Aug 2013 #29
More like he shovels the most BS, espescially when someone disagrees with him. CtDemoFarmer Aug 2013 #32
I disagree. Evergreen Emerald Aug 2013 #33
she was introduced as an expert on Russia NoMoreWarNow Aug 2013 #39
When you get caught without the facts during the time you are having a moment of glory then don't Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #30
She had the facts. They were just not the facts O'Donnell wanted. NoMoreWarNow Aug 2013 #38
She did not have the facts, she had the facts she wanted to tell, two different things. Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #41
so you think she is an agent of Russia or something? NoMoreWarNow Aug 2013 #44
She did not have her facts together, I never said she was an agent of Russia, perhaps Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #45
A stupid, meaningless discussion wtmusic Aug 2013 #36
O'Donnell is the Bill O'Reilly of MSNBC. ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #43
O'Donnel simply didn't like what she was saying burnodo Aug 2013 #46
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Lawrence O'Donnell Blows ...»Reply #21