Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TinkerTot55

(198 posts)
3. This is not an issue of breastfeeding discrimination.
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 10:56 PM
Aug 2013

This is an example of people who love to push buttons and get attention.

The issue is not that breastfeeding is banned or frowned upon. The facility where the husband and wife chose to be confrontational and sensational has a PRO-breastfeeding policy, and provides comfortable facilities for moms and infants. The facility asked her to COVER UP while breastfeeding. I noticed in the clips I viewed that the mom is keeping her back to the camera, and the husband is not showing how the child is attached, and how much breast is exposed or not. There is NOTHING wrong with asking moms to put a lightweight, opaque cloth over their shoulders and across the feeding infant; it can be done very discreetly. If done in that manner, there's no reason for anyone to object. Most people won't even know that you are breastfeeding, if done that way. Having a light cloth or blanket over the nursing infant also blocks all the outside stimuli and helps the baby relax and nurse.

I wish that every mom could successfully nurse their children, as I did with my three children; but I don't want to see your breasts, no matter how natural it is. It's not necessary, period. You can nurse ANYWHERE...it's your RIGHT as a mother to do so.....but you don't have to be an exhibitionist. And that's what this incident is about.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

These people act like feeding your child is right up there with giving a bj in public. Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2013 #1
Oh my god a nipple!!!! Quixote1818 Aug 2013 #2
(R) Rep. Wilson is against Capitalism lobodons Aug 2013 #5
This is not an issue of breastfeeding discrimination. TinkerTot55 Aug 2013 #3
Why should the mother cover up the baby? RC Aug 2013 #6
So many people assuming facts not in evidence. TinkerTot55 Aug 2013 #15
Nothing wrong with asking, but if you're going to demand it, I affraid I'm going to........ W T F Aug 2013 #7
Actually, no. TinkerTot55 Aug 2013 #13
There is EVERYTHING wrong with . . . MrModerate Aug 2013 #8
You are saying they had the right but shouldn't? Quixote1818 Aug 2013 #11
Please read carefully? TinkerTot55 Aug 2013 #14
Neither is there any particular benefit to the baby in being covered . . .n/t markpkessinger Aug 2013 #20
BS, get over it. Breast feeding is better for a baby and one of the most natural things that occurs glowing Aug 2013 #16
Amusing.... TinkerTot55 Aug 2013 #17
No, she had one side of her tank top down and her child was blocking most of her breast with glowing Aug 2013 #18
But there is also no harm in Not being modest. It should be up to each mother to decide okwmember Aug 2013 #19
The decision of whether or not to "be modest" should be for the nursing mother to decide... markpkessinger Aug 2013 #21
Yes, it's the attention-whoring. Pool Hall Ace Aug 2013 #23
everyone should have the right to suck on body parts anywhere they want in public nt msongs Aug 2013 #4
At the very least, up to the age of two . . . n/t MrModerate Aug 2013 #9
Ok I have to laugh. Hassin Bin Sober Aug 2013 #10
I often breast fed in public. SheilaT Aug 2013 #12
Bottle VS. Breast feed children.... Corporate america has cultivated the talking points midnight Aug 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Breastfeeding Discriminat...»Reply #3