Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
24. The devil is in the details...
Wed Oct 30, 2013, 01:14 PM
Oct 2013

Yes, radiation can kill. So can water. There is a difference between a hug and a bone splintering embrace, and too many of these articles are using fear and ignorance to equate the former with the later.

Yes, Fukushima was a bad accident with devistating consequences for the people who lived in the immediate area. Most of the damage was financial and cultural, but there are almost certain to be some long term health effects as well. I suggest you watch the documentary: "Children of the Tsunami" for a heartbreaking look at how this impacted the kids in this area. I will link to it below.



In any case, that's the impact, and it is bad enough to justify any anti-nuclear position you might like. It's not helpful to try and stretch it beyond this, and the attempts to do so using fictional nightmare scenarios and pretend science only turn people off.

More, and this needs to be said, Fukushima was only one aspect of a much more significant disaster. The Tohoku Quake and Tsunami damaged or destroyed over 1.2 MILLION significant buildings, killed at least 19,000 people, and caused close to a Trillion USD in direct and indirect damages. It literally wiped hundreds of cities and towns and villages off the map, and even when the people survived there is nothing left there to return to. The entire eastern coast of the nation was wiped clean.

This is the tragedy being swept aside and dismissed to focus attention on these fictions. Watch all of this video. These are children watching everything they know and love destroyed -- including in many cases their families.



No. Actually WATCH it. It's still gone. Last year this is what it still looked like:

http://nipponnews.photoshelter.com/image/I0000Hd27gewGGTU

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

OTOH Richard D Oct 2013 #1
Science isn't for Dummies. GeorgeGist Oct 2013 #2
No evidence of a plume", you mean the one that was detectable with monitors???? BethMomDem Oct 2013 #3
Please help me out understand about this plume. What exactly made up the plume? rhett o rick Oct 2013 #4
Are you asking for a complete breakdown of how fallout accumulates and travels? BethMomDem Oct 2013 #5
Let's start over. Radiation is radiated energy that is emitted from a radiation source. rhett o rick Oct 2013 #12
That would be implied with the word, RADIATION----RADIATE, I'm sorry you didn't pick up on that. BethMomDem Oct 2013 #16
Yes I guess I got confused when you said, "Radiation was (and is being released) and rose with steam rhett o rick Oct 2013 #18
Radiation did in fact rain down, radio-contamination is in fact RADIATION. BethMomDem Oct 2013 #19
This is an extremely important issue. All the more important to discuss it rhett o rick Oct 2013 #26
BTW I am not opposed to Nuclear energy generation. BethMomDem Oct 2013 #17
There was no plume. Coyotl Oct 2013 #7
Plume of radiative particles IN AIR AND WATER, SOME ROSE WITH STEAM, the rest dumped in the water BethMomDem Oct 2013 #21
Ouch! What a smack down! nt Demo_Chris Oct 2013 #15
In order to do a scientific study that truedelphi Oct 2013 #6
If RT say it, there is a 60 % chance that this is 100 % bullshit. Sand Wind Oct 2013 #8
Highest radiation level seen in 2 years near Fukushima reactor — TeeYiYi Oct 2013 #9
Equivalent dose DhhD Oct 2013 #10
Radiation Damage DhhD Oct 2013 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author bowens43 Oct 2013 #13
That's just ridiculous. According the the World Health Organization... Demo_Chris Oct 2013 #14
Money protects money. I guess all the anomalous deaths, diseases and dead zones in the pacific BethMomDem Oct 2013 #20
I'll stick with science and leave faith to the faithful. nt Demo_Chris Oct 2013 #22
Science says MELTDOWNS release dangerous, biologically destructive material. You mean that science? BethMomDem Oct 2013 #23
The devil is in the details... Demo_Chris Oct 2013 #24
I do understand all that, nonetheless, people here are sick, people there have died. BethMomDem Oct 2013 #25
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Peer Reviewed Study Shows...»Reply #24