Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

Hekate

(100,133 posts)

37. 1. Watch the video 2. Read the information in this thread 3. Use fewer question marks.

Reply to yeoman6987 (Reply #28)

Tue Nov 12, 2013, 11:06 PM

Nov 2013

All will become clear to you.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Woman Burned by McDonald's Hot Coffee, Then the News Media [View all] Quixote1818 Nov 2013 OP

Thanks for posting... suzanner Nov 2013 #1

Its a frivolous lawsuit not because she wasn't burned. She was, horribly. She was burned because ... marble falls Nov 2013 #6

Except for the fact that the coffee was far hotter than it should have been ET Awful Nov 2013 #7

My tea is hotter zipplewrath Nov 2013 #8

Your tea is 180 degrees? I doubt that seriously. ET Awful Nov 2013 #9

The jury did zipplewrath Nov 2013 #10

You seem to have misread the verdict. ET Awful Nov 2013 #11

When served zipplewrath Nov 2013 #12

So, in your world, receiving hundreds of reports of injury doesn't warrant action? ET Awful Nov 2013 #13

Action or responsibility? zipplewrath Nov 2013 #16

Complete and utter nonsense. ET Awful Nov 2013 #19

How low was low enough? zipplewrath Nov 2013 #20

What an astounding demonstration of your lack of reading comprehension . . . ET Awful Nov 2013 #21

I'm trying to stay civil zipplewrath Nov 2013 #22

Ummm. . . they didn't need to know what would satisfy a jury, they needed to listen to the numerous ET Awful Nov 2013 #23

Easy to say in hindsight zipplewrath Nov 2013 #24

You're merely trying to over complicate things. ET Awful Nov 2013 #25

I'll ignore your personal attacks zipplewrath Nov 2013 #30

It's quite obvious that you have no knowledge of what product liability is ET Awful Nov 2013 #32

I understand, I just don't agree zipplewrath Nov 2013 #39

You fail to grasp the whole concept of product liability... Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2013 #35

Oh, I understand it zipplewrath Nov 2013 #38

Please see my post #14 about how a splash on my sister's ankle gave her 3rd degree burns Hekate Nov 2013 #17

I'm sorry for your sister zipplewrath Nov 2013 #18

A buddy of mine spent two weeks in the hospital after spilling... Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2013 #34

except that is not true....they were parked. VanillaRhapsody Nov 2013 #26

Oh, then why did the trial judge portion some of the blame on her and her grandson? marble falls Nov 2013 #31

Proof please.. VanillaRhapsody Nov 2013 #36

I live in the city where it happened and we got a lot more news about it than Chung reported Warpy Nov 2013 #27

One... rsdsharp Nov 2013 #29

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #33

Yes, thank you. Very informative and interesting. closeupready Nov 2013 #2

I had never seen the photos of the burns before this, no one would laugh if they saw those Bjorn Against Nov 2013 #3

Links to some facts on the case... SpankMe Nov 2013 #4

The simple thing would have been for McDonald's to settle for $20,000 davidpdx Nov 2013 #5

A bit? I'd say a bit more than a bit. n/t VWolf Nov 2013 #15

My sis burned her ankle so badly she almost needed a skin graft Hekate Nov 2013 #14

McDonald's Coffee yeoman6987 Nov 2013 #28

1. Watch the video 2. Read the information in this thread 3. Use fewer question marks. Hekate Nov 2013 #37