Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Understanding the Science of Genetically Modified Foods (GMOs) [View all]bvar22
(39,909 posts)11. I can only wish that our politicians in Washington, the USDA, and the FDA...
..had been as conscientious about demanding PROOF before they gave Monsanto the Go Ahead
to let these new, invasive organisms loose in our environment.
GMOs were "grandfathered" onto the list of "approved" because Monsanto said they really weren't that different for those found in nature.
If Monsanto can show me that they put a tomato and a salmon in the barn overnight, and they got together and produced and offspring,
I would come closer to believe their outrageous claim.
Whatever happened to this guy?
He would have made a good President.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Understanding the Science of Genetically Modified Foods (GMOs) [View all]
Mr_Jefferson_24
Mar 2014
OP
"If that protein is safe to eat from its original source, it is safe to eat in its new source."
Veilex
Mar 2014
#15
I'd like to see a single scientific method based research paper that has been peer reviewed on...
Veilex
Mar 2014
#37
Generally if it says "soy, corn or canola" on the label then it is GMO -- THAT is the labeling
KurtNYC
Mar 2014
#30