Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Understanding the Science of Genetically Modified Foods (GMOs) [View all]wisechoice
(180 posts)31. wrong conclusion
You are making it so simple. What about better medicines, better knowledge of roundup. graph has upward slope starting from 70s when there were no GMOs. Btw, allergies have been increasing recently.
So many here are quick to dispose of the health risks of gmos. It is controversial even among scientists. I see posts here saying anyone who raises doubts on gmos are against science. And they think they know all about how genes work. Last I know, the science has not understood everything about genes.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Understanding the Science of Genetically Modified Foods (GMOs) [View all]
Mr_Jefferson_24
Mar 2014
OP
"If that protein is safe to eat from its original source, it is safe to eat in its new source."
Veilex
Mar 2014
#15
I'd like to see a single scientific method based research paper that has been peer reviewed on...
Veilex
Mar 2014
#37
Generally if it says "soy, corn or canola" on the label then it is GMO -- THAT is the labeling
KurtNYC
Mar 2014
#30