Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Understanding the Science of Genetically Modified Foods (GMOs) [View all]Veilex
(1,555 posts)34. This is exactly what I was saying earlier...
When you people with no scientific background saying something, and publishing that thing, just because it follows poplar views, simply doesn't make it true. It is much akin to "I saw it on TV, so it must be true!"
I'm far from a GMO advocate. But I believe in calling a spade a spade.
The GMO issue doesn't become true or false on public opinion.
It becomes true or false on scientific research.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Understanding the Science of Genetically Modified Foods (GMOs) [View all]
Mr_Jefferson_24
Mar 2014
OP
"If that protein is safe to eat from its original source, it is safe to eat in its new source."
Veilex
Mar 2014
#15
I'd like to see a single scientific method based research paper that has been peer reviewed on...
Veilex
Mar 2014
#37
Generally if it says "soy, corn or canola" on the label then it is GMO -- THAT is the labeling
KurtNYC
Mar 2014
#30