Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Brainstormy

(2,551 posts)
2. Personally I don't think so
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:34 AM
Mar 2014

I do believe there may be a genetic trigger, but the rise in autism spectrum disorders is so outsize as to be incredible. It's got to be environmental. I'm going to catch up on the mercury thing, but I'm doing food research, and finding SO much science suggesting gestational exposure to pesticides.

In California’s rich Central Valley agricultural region, a 600% increased incidence in autism was observed among children up to 5 years of age for births from 1990 to 2001, yet only one-third of the rise could be explained by identified factors such as changing diagnostic criteria for autism or a younger age at diagnosis.

600%!!! Nothing but an environmental factor can account for that. And populations, like the Amish, who do vaccinate but don't employ pesticides or typically plant pesticide-containing GMO crops have rates of like 1 in 10,000.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

THIS IS BS! De Leonist Mar 2014 #1
Personally I don't think so Brainstormy Mar 2014 #2
Quite frankly I think you are wrong De Leonist Mar 2014 #4
Asberger's ghoti Mar 2014 #3
Thats inaccurate, well kinda De Leonist Mar 2014 #5
Mark Blaxill writes, "For some, myself included, a picture is worth a thousand words." proverbialwisdom Apr 2014 #6
No comment. proverbialwisdom Nov 2014 #7
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Mark Blaxill on autism an...»Reply #2