Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: CEO Who Resisted NSA Spying Out Of Prison, Vindicated By Snowden [View all]ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)39. Hi JD. I'm willing to give anyone a shot if the facts bear it out, but flat out, this doesn't do it
The issue is that the insider trading he did happened before the DOD contract came up. Not only that, but Quest actually got a good chunk of the business anyway through a subsidiary, after they initially didn't bid on it at all.
Nacchio's claims of exoneration are complete bull.
Former Joe Nacchio lieutenant disputes ex-Qwest CEOs claim of NSA retaliation
James F.X. Payne joined Qwest in August 1999 near the height of Nacchios five-year tenure and worked directly with Nacchio on government contracts as senior vice president of the companys Government Systems Division.
During the Fox interview, Nacchio referenced a meeting at the headquarters of the National Security Agency in February 2001 in which he expected to learn about the fate of a lucrative contract. At the end of the meeting, he said, the government made a peculiar request that he thought wasnt legal.
The reason I was invited into that meeting the reason the CEO shows up is because youre at the contract phase, the people want to look across the table at you and know that if they need something, will you be there for them? Nacchio said. I expected, going into the meeting, that we were going to win a $50 to $150 to $200 million contract. I did not learn we did not win that contract until June 2001.
The timing is key because Nacchios illegal stock sales occurred in early 2001.
...
Joe was only at the NSA once in his years at Qwest. I escorted him there and was with him at all times during that one meeting. To my knowledge that is the sum total of his engagement with that agency, Payne said. Further, the contract that he cited that was denied Qwest in retaliation for lack of cooperation was never bid by Qwest. It was the subject of intense inquiry by the government in preparation for the trial. Ironically, even though Qwest did not bid as a prime on that contract, we did bid as a subcontractor to a prime and that team did win.
During the Fox interview, Nacchio referenced a meeting at the headquarters of the National Security Agency in February 2001 in which he expected to learn about the fate of a lucrative contract. At the end of the meeting, he said, the government made a peculiar request that he thought wasnt legal.
The reason I was invited into that meeting the reason the CEO shows up is because youre at the contract phase, the people want to look across the table at you and know that if they need something, will you be there for them? Nacchio said. I expected, going into the meeting, that we were going to win a $50 to $150 to $200 million contract. I did not learn we did not win that contract until June 2001.
The timing is key because Nacchios illegal stock sales occurred in early 2001.
...
Joe was only at the NSA once in his years at Qwest. I escorted him there and was with him at all times during that one meeting. To my knowledge that is the sum total of his engagement with that agency, Payne said. Further, the contract that he cited that was denied Qwest in retaliation for lack of cooperation was never bid by Qwest. It was the subject of intense inquiry by the government in preparation for the trial. Ironically, even though Qwest did not bid as a prime on that contract, we did bid as a subcontractor to a prime and that team did win.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I wish I could rec this a thousand times. I wish I were that sure that he was blameless
Demeter
Apr 2014
#4
Firebagger/Naterite logic: Being against crooked CEOs = conformist/authoritarian
ConservativeDemocrat
Apr 2014
#12
Are you calling other DU posters, "Firebaggers and Naderites?" Is this whining?
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#44
Hi JD. I'm willing to give anyone a shot if the facts bear it out, but flat out, this doesn't do it
ConservativeDemocrat
Apr 2014
#39
So why did the government claim that evidence should be excluded from the trial due to
JDPriestly
Apr 2014
#50
Watch his interview with Maria Bartolucci (hope I got the name right) in Post # 13.
JDPriestly
Apr 2014
#38
You are in poor company. George Bush thinks he is a crook also. He didnt fool you too? nm
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#46
"Orthodoxy means not thinking—not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." George Orwell
20score
Apr 2014
#26
What massive corruption? And part of why he went to jail was for almost destroying a company?
cui bono
Apr 2014
#27
Insider trading is what Bush accused him of. You seem to be on the wrong side of history here. nm
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#48
Maria Bartiromo did a lengthy interview with him last week. Very interesting. Link:
7962
Apr 2014
#13
No, I didnt post it elsewhere; I didnt think about it till it was too late for "breaking news".
7962
Apr 2014
#40
K&R. We DUErs knew about this a number of years ago. I remember this case clearly.
JDPriestly
Apr 2014
#30
I agree that there has been a "coup". I believe those that took control still have control. nm
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#62