Video & Multimedia

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)

8. same round

Sat Apr 19, 2014, 05:38 PM

Apr 2014

.223 just about the size of a .22, larger case size. Same rate of fire. Thank goodness it is not a scary assault weapon.

A=.22LR
B=.223 Rifle

I think you are right in the video, so here is another compliant rifle in the correct caliber. 5.56 and also one in 7.62.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ban Avoidance: Custom-made guns evade US arms control laws [View all] DeSwiss Apr 2014 OP

The headline is false. The manufacturers are following the law to the letter. Jgarrick Apr 2014 #1

They and gun fanciers they feed, sure wouldn't understand "spirit" of the law. Hoyt Apr 2014 #4

The magazine on the "New, but what's the difference" gun looks much smaller caliber. Electric Monk Apr 2014 #2

same round Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #8

re: .22 vs .223, do I really need to explain the concept of kinetic energy to you? Electric Monk Apr 2014 #14

yep, any round can kill Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #16

Thanks again for demonstrating again how you aren't really here for an honest open discussion. nt Electric Monk Apr 2014 #35

and what would you like to discuss? Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #36

I found that odd as well. Jgarrick Apr 2014 #10

Gun manufacturers and the crowd they feed don't understand spirit of law. Hoyt Apr 2014 #3

Ban all semi-autos? Good luck with that...! Jgarrick Apr 2014 #5

Hilarious. Ed Suspicious Apr 2014 #6

That someone would seriously entertain the notion that it's remotely possible? You bet! Jgarrick Apr 2014 #11

That would have gun fanciers puckering all over America. Hoyt Apr 2014 #7

just go with pump action Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #12

Not to mention the Troy Pump Action Sporting Rifle. Jgarrick Apr 2014 #13

thats not an assault weapon Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #18

Exactly so. A pump-action rifle isn't an "assault weapon" by definition. Unless they change the Jgarrick Apr 2014 #20

moving the goalposts Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #21

how do you enforce Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #9

+1 Jgarrick Apr 2014 #15

Well you have a point since gun fanciers appear to care little for society, just their Hoyt Apr 2014 #23

cue the thought police Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #26

If a gun owner purchases a rifle that is legal for him to own, Jgarrick Apr 2014 #28

It's legal to fly a confederate, nazi, or Gadsden flag. But it's immoral. Hoyt Apr 2014 #29

You think legally buying a rifle is on the same moral plane as advocating for the Nazi Party Jgarrick Apr 2014 #32

Assault style rifles are most often acquired by right/white wing bigots. Hoyt Apr 2014 #42

I would not agree with those Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #33

Thought Diremoon Apr 2014 #17

Maybe if the NRA and other gun promoters stayed out of the process, it would work better. Hoyt Apr 2014 #43

K&R billh58 Apr 2014 #19

De nada. DeSwiss Apr 2014 #34

"So with a few cosmetic changes... is no longer an assault rifle" lumberjack_jeff Apr 2014 #22

It's not the rifle per se, it's the yahoos attracted to them. Hoyt Apr 2014 #24

If you have a legislative solution to that in mind, I'm all ears. n/t lumberjack_jeff Apr 2014 #25

I am curious Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #27

No you aren't. You are a gun promoter. Hoyt Apr 2014 #30

that got him Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #31

Actually, I'm not. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2014 #37

And anybody attracted to those cosmetics is too sick to own a gun. Hoyt Apr 2014 #38

There's a circular nature to this conversation. n/t lumberjack_jeff Apr 2014 #39

You got it, and right in the middle are irrational gun loving yahoos who are a blight on society. Hoyt Apr 2014 #40

Thought crime! Jgarrick Apr 2014 #41