Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
45. The country needs her. She can appoint competent people for State and other positions.
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:22 PM
Jul 2014

She is very strong on labor issues.

The primary issue in this country, the issue from which all other issues flow, is economic disparity. Every other issue is related to that issue. And the reason we have economic disparity is that our tax system favors wealth and our social system disfavors the poor.

I worked for a homeless project for about 8 years and have dealt professionally with other issues including issues related to family and children. The economic problems of our country are central to every other problem we have -- even transportation and our involvement in oil-producing countries. Every problem goes back to the soul-destroying economic injustice in our country.

We can have capitalism, the creativity of capitalism and still have a fair economy. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are the only responsible voices focusing on this core issue.

Hillary is all over the place. She is great on women's issues, but as I have so often pointed out, the Bill Clinton legacy has unfortunately worked out so that the mistakes he made have overshadowed the good he did. I won't list his many mistakes. Hillary will hear about them over and over during the campaign if she runs. She certainly did not handle the question about RIFRA very well. That law should have been overturned by the Supreme Court. It is fraught with problems. Anyway we will never agree on this. I really think Hillary should leave well enough alone and not drag Bill Clinton's legacy through the mud by running.

Let's just talk about NAFTA and its effects on the US economy.

One million American jobs lost to NAFTA. The Economic Policy Institute estimates that the rising trade deficit with Mexico and Canada since NAFTA went into effect eliminated about pne million net jobs in the United States by 2004. . . . EPI further calculates that the ballooning trade deficit with Mexico alone destroyed about seven hundred thousand net U.S. jobs between NAFTA’s implementation and 2010. . . . Moreover, official government data reveals that nearly five million U.S. manufacturing jobs have been lost overall since NAFTA
took effect. . . . Obviously, not all of these lost U.S. manufacturing jobs – one out of every four of our manufacturing jobs – is due to NAFTA. The United States entered the World
Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995. China joined WTO in 2000 and the U.S. trade deficit with China soared thereafter. However, at the same time, given the methodology employed, it is
also likely that the EPI estimates do not capture the full U.S. job loss associated with NAFTA.
Service sector jobs have also been negatively impacted by NAFTA, as closed factories no longer demand services. EPI estimates that one third of the jobs lost due to the rising trade deficit under NAFTA were in non-manufacturing sectors of the economy.

http://www.citizen.org/documents/NAFTAs-Broken-Promises.pdf

We need to have a national discussion about our economy. I don't think Hillary is the person to lead it. She does not have that kind of understanding of the economy. Elizabeth Warren is the person to lead Americans into rethinking how we can make sure that all Americans have the opportunity and incentives to make the contributions to our economy and our society that they are capable of making. We are headed in the wrong direction with regard to those issues. Bill Clinton did not know how to make the changes we needed. I do not trust Hillary to figure it out. Elizabeth Warren has already figured out a lot of it. At least she knows what is wrong.

That's why I will not vote for Hillary Clinton. I'd rather help a third party candidate if she is running on the Democratic ticket. I think here in Southern California, a vote for Hillary would be a wasted vote. She is too much of a generalist. We need Elizabeth Warren and her expertise right now.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No trouble expressing herself. Countries where girls aren't issued birth certificates - chilling. freshwest Jul 2014 #1
Yea the bit about countries where girls aren't even issued birth certificates... Triana Jul 2014 #2
And she knows more than that, I'm sure. Her analysis of what that kind of misogyny leads to... freshwest Jul 2014 #3
Exactly... Historic NY Jul 2014 #6
It encourages me. One can be defined by their enemies. And hers are troglodytes. freshwest Jul 2014 #7
Doesn't scare this woman in the least. merrily Jul 2014 #33
I don't trust this woman. She pals around with Christian Dominionist, MENTOR, and "close friend," blkmusclmachine Jul 2014 #4
Silly ass comment. LuvLoogie Jul 2014 #5
Nothing silly about facts. Denial is not your friend. merrily Jul 2014 #14
She attended Bible studies and prayer meetings. Beacool Jul 2014 #23
IOW, she was connected to The Family. Thanks, I know. merrily Jul 2014 #25
Spreading B.S. is not your friend either. Beacool Jul 2014 #28
not silly at all. navarth Jul 2014 #8
You keep repeating that like a mantra, Beacool Jul 2014 #22
Actually, navarth posted that ONCE. Not repetitive and certainly not like a merrily Jul 2014 #27
Navarth has written that same comment over and over in various threads. Beacool Jul 2014 #32
Supporting facts in many threads? Oooo, let's stop that nonsense! merrily Jul 2014 #34
No, repetitively bringing up stuff that have zero to do with the OP is silly. Beacool Jul 2014 #37
K&R lovemydog Jul 2014 #9
Hillary is a strong advocate for women's civil rights, but the fact remains that Bill Clinton JDPriestly Jul 2014 #10
Those are all excellent points, JDPriestly lovemydog Jul 2014 #11
I live in California. I will vote for all other Democrats, but at least now I do not think I JDPriestly Jul 2014 #12
Elizabeth Warren is a one issue politician with minimal political experience Beacool Jul 2014 #24
The country needs her. She can appoint competent people for State and other positions. JDPriestly Jul 2014 #45
Biden also cited that authorization rationale. merrily Jul 2014 #17
Association with The Family is not a religion, though. merrily Jul 2014 #29
She will not be an impressive candidate for president. Enthusiast Jul 2014 #13
However, if the DNC succeeds in avoiding a real primary, merrily Jul 2014 #15
Hillary must be questioned about her economic policies. Enthusiast Jul 2014 #16
I agree. Sadly, it's not up to you or me. merrily Jul 2014 #18
"Follow the money" navarth Jul 2014 #20
She's impressive enough for the vast majority of Democrats. Beacool Jul 2014 #26
Who would be impressed with anyone the DNC designated. merrily Jul 2014 #31
Nope, they would not. Beacool Jul 2014 #35
She is not a nominee. A designee, maybe. merrily Jul 2014 #36
Dismissive much, aren't you? Beacool Jul 2014 #39
Saying she is not a nominee yet is dismissive? It's fact. merrily Jul 2014 #41
There will be a primary, there always is. Beacool Jul 2014 #42
Single payer is the answer. KurtNYC Jul 2014 #19
K&R stonecutter357 Jul 2014 #21
I see that the usual mudslingers have attempted to hijack your thread. Beacool Jul 2014 #30
My, what a sophisticated rebuttal, calling people who don't merrily Jul 2014 #38
Please, how many people on DU have felt the need to say that they would not vote for her Beacool Jul 2014 #40
Hillary's response in this vid is great. SCOTUS is dead wrong in their ruling on Hobby Lobby. hue Jul 2014 #43
But but but iandhr Jul 2014 #44
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Hillary Clinton destroys ...»Reply #45