Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
1. Agreed. Science deniers are active on DU.
Sun Aug 10, 2014, 10:58 AM
Aug 2014

I am remembering the thread about astrophysicists and bio-molecular chemist relating to transformation, mutation, cell poisons and cross-kingdom GMOs being discussed by a consumer.

If GMO are not harmful, then why not label them? Why would an astrophysicist be afraid of labeling something, in their belief system, that is safe?

Wild type corn seed is one kind of organism and GMO cells are a different organism having its reproduction system changed into another species that cannot reproduce.

The world-wide scientific community should insist that these new organisms be renamed, therefore having a new bar code and sold separately at food stores and grain stores. A bend could simply read, Wild Type Corn. Monsanto want its organisms to remain separate, correct? Said so in court, correct? The grocery store binds could read, Company Name Corn and Wild Type Corn; by City Ordinance.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Cenk Explains Why Money T...»Reply #1