Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Kevin O'Leary (SharkTank) badly beaten in GMO debate with 14 year-old girl [View all]KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)59. Prior to GMO Starlink, was there ever an issue regarding how much plant-made toxin that corn might
contain?
The phrase "safe limit" is key. There is no limit to how much organic corn one should eat, either raw or cooked, but there is with GMO corn. That's the difference, and the evidence that GMO corn, improperly handled or uncooked, is unsafe.
Even the makers of GMO organisms don't say what you asserted, eg. that GMOs are completely safe. The debate now is whether pre-market testing of GMOs is adequate.
Outside of human consumption issues, there is this -- drastically reduced yields from GMO farming:
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/money/agriculture/2014/06/22/superweeds-choke-farms/11231231/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kevin O'Leary (SharkTank) badly beaten in GMO debate with 14 year-old girl [View all]
KurtNYC
Aug 2014
OP
Science 101: Scientific theories can be disproven or supported but they can't be proven.
KurtNYC
Aug 2014
#6
Source watch alert!!! Why do all roads for GMOs (Monsanto) among other shit stains on our
mother earth
Aug 2014
#8
That is pure BS, HE is The Genetic Literacy Project, and all studies there are pro-industry
mother earth
Aug 2014
#14
It has been stated far and wide, as always, the reason GMOs are in question is because there are no
mother earth
Aug 2014
#39
No, it is difficult to sift through any of the "available" studies. For one thing many of the so
mother earth
Aug 2014
#68
HE is running a front group paid for by his clients, i.e., MONSANTO. There is no credibility to any
mother earth
Aug 2014
#15
The GMOs of today are far different than what once might have been utilized by "independent"
mother earth
Aug 2014
#37
You have refused to read the studies. and have formed your own opinions.
Dr Hobbitstein
Aug 2014
#43
An old saying; put your money where your mouth is, noting personal. You content there is
DhhD
Aug 2014
#16
"Broadcaster" jumps on to gang up on Rachel several times, adding to the Kevin Effect
drynberg
Aug 2014
#3
Good point. The girl clearly is not making a living lobbying government officials for changes to
KurtNYC
Aug 2014
#23
His favorite is the desperate person who doesn't know that have a gold mine....
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2014
#30
Fun fact: Europe is made up entirely of 14-year-old anti-GMO hysterics n/t
RufusTFirefly
Aug 2014
#41
Yes, I meant Bush/Cheney. And the "scientific consensus" is meaningless when the research
pnwmom
Aug 2014
#67
You said there as no evidence that GMO crops are unsafe for human consumption yet
KurtNYC
Aug 2014
#57