Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Kevin O'Leary (SharkTank) badly beaten in GMO debate with 14 year-old girl [View all]pnwmom
(110,298 posts)64. GMO's have been PRESUMED, not proven safe, since 1992.
This is when the FDA declared that henceforth, GMO products would be presumed safe, and the burden would be on anyone who thought a product was unsafe to prove that it was unsafe.
At the same time, the FDA allowed the GMO producers to control GMO seeds, so only approved researchers were allowed to use the seeds for research; and these researchers were required to sign confidentiality agreements in order to use the seeds. These agreements allowed the producers to ban the publication of any research they wanted to ban.
So all the research you see is favorable for GMO products because that is all the producers will allow to be published. And they got this power from the 1992 decision of the FDA. And we have Dick Cheney to thank for that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kevin O'Leary (SharkTank) badly beaten in GMO debate with 14 year-old girl [View all]
KurtNYC
Aug 2014
OP
Science 101: Scientific theories can be disproven or supported but they can't be proven.
KurtNYC
Aug 2014
#6
Source watch alert!!! Why do all roads for GMOs (Monsanto) among other shit stains on our
mother earth
Aug 2014
#8
That is pure BS, HE is The Genetic Literacy Project, and all studies there are pro-industry
mother earth
Aug 2014
#14
It has been stated far and wide, as always, the reason GMOs are in question is because there are no
mother earth
Aug 2014
#39
No, it is difficult to sift through any of the "available" studies. For one thing many of the so
mother earth
Aug 2014
#68
HE is running a front group paid for by his clients, i.e., MONSANTO. There is no credibility to any
mother earth
Aug 2014
#15
The GMOs of today are far different than what once might have been utilized by "independent"
mother earth
Aug 2014
#37
You have refused to read the studies. and have formed your own opinions.
Dr Hobbitstein
Aug 2014
#43
An old saying; put your money where your mouth is, noting personal. You content there is
DhhD
Aug 2014
#16
"Broadcaster" jumps on to gang up on Rachel several times, adding to the Kevin Effect
drynberg
Aug 2014
#3
Good point. The girl clearly is not making a living lobbying government officials for changes to
KurtNYC
Aug 2014
#23
His favorite is the desperate person who doesn't know that have a gold mine....
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2014
#30
Fun fact: Europe is made up entirely of 14-year-old anti-GMO hysterics n/t
RufusTFirefly
Aug 2014
#41
Yes, I meant Bush/Cheney. And the "scientific consensus" is meaningless when the research
pnwmom
Aug 2014
#67
You said there as no evidence that GMO crops are unsafe for human consumption yet
KurtNYC
Aug 2014
#57