Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

midnight

(26,624 posts)
16. Because there has been little to know study on children and their brain function one would think at
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 07:24 AM
Jan 2015

the very least the dept. of education and the community would error on the side of precaution, and not place this tower in the middle of a playground.

Below I posted a few paragraphs from your link:


"Studies in people

Very few human studies have focused specifically on cellular phone towers and cancer risk.

In one large study, British researchers compared a group of more than 1,000 families of young children with cancer against a similar group of families of children without cancer. They found no link between a mother’s exposure to the towers during pregnancy (based on the distance from the home to the nearest tower and on the amount of energy given off by nearby towers) and the risk of early childhood cancer.

In another study, researchers compared a group of more than 2,600 children with cancer to a group of similar children without cancer. They found that those who lived in a town that could have exposed them to higher than average RF radiation from cellular phone towers in the previous 5 years had a slightly higher risk of cancer, although not of any certain type of cancer (like leukemia or brain tumors). This study estimated the children’s possible exposure based on the number of towers in their town and how strong the signals were from the towers. It did not look at actual exposure of any individual child based on how far their home or school was from a tower. This limitation reduces confidence in the results of the study."

This link identifies the results of the study are so limited as to not provide the confidence that dismisses this location as harmless or not very harmless. So, at the very least lets keep these out of our children's play grounds.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

My guess is that someone is being paid for allowing it to be there. NYC_SKP Jan 2015 #1
what's wrong with a cell tower on campus itsrobert Jan 2015 #2
It is interfering with brain function. midnight Jan 2015 #8
Well, then, we're going to need to pull 'em all down, then... MADem Jan 2015 #9
Because there has been little to know study on children and their brain function one would think at midnight Jan 2015 #16
You'll have to challenge the school board/superintendent on that score. MADem Jan 2015 #21
No it's not... Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2015 #20
Yup, the video is made by crackpots itsrobert Jan 2015 #22
Cite, please. mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2015 #23
k & r ! n/t wildbilln864 Jan 2015 #3
Maybe because local geography and coverage made it a good spot? jberryhill Jan 2015 #4
My guess is some pol got a kickback...this shows "No Respect", no? drynberg Jan 2015 #17
The question is why are the children so close to the powerful Microwave Ford_Prefect Jan 2015 #5
"Dangerous" "High power" Major Nikon Jan 2015 #6
Yeah, the sign means 'don't climb this while it's on'. AtheistCrusader Jan 2015 #12
There was a democrat in Tampa Fla helping to place cell towers on elementary property! TheNutcracker Jan 2015 #7
The school is probably receiving a monthly doc03 Jan 2015 #10
Comes out to a 33k a year.... Historic NY Jan 2015 #13
No more harmfull than a radio tower Quixote1818 Jan 2015 #11
Much less so Major Nikon Jan 2015 #18
And less because of this tower Mark Baker Jan 2015 #19
The two ignorant kids who put out this video have a plethora of anti-science shit videos Quixote1818 Jan 2015 #14
Call it crack pot but would you trust the corporations Historic NY Jan 2015 #25
I knew it was going to turn out this was a minority school.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #15
Location, location, location. mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2015 #24
The one article is from a decade ago and the other is about tuition. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #26
The school district gets money, that's why. Sienna86 Jan 2015 #27
That..... DeSwiss Jan 2015 #28
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Why Is This Giant Cell Ph...»Reply #16