Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JohnnyRingo

(20,777 posts)
52. I guess there's a chance that not one person was carrying there.
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 03:27 PM
Jan 2015

But it is a very slim chance in Colorado where only cowboy hats outnumber pistols, and playing the odds isn't a claim of telepathic skills.

Common sense dictates that a good number of armed citizens left their gun holstered and ran the other way that fateful day. Given how firing on the gunman would likely have made them the next target, it was probably wise, but saying CCW laws makes the public safer is a gross exaggeration of fact.

For the record, I'm not an anti gun advocate. I personally own a number of Colts, both single action army and semi-auto, that I treasure and enjoy using. I don't carry in public, but I feel I have no reason to, and at 60 years old, it appears I've been correct in that assumption.

I have friends who do carry however, including one who won't mow the lawn without his concealed .380 (not kidding), but they aren't the armed heroes they like to visualize themselves as either. Instead I just see them as insecure followers who jumped on a passing bandwagon. Most of them didn't even buy a gun until the CCW law passed here in Ohio and would probably just piss themselves if faced with a shooting situation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And the volunteer knew they were coming. louis-t Jan 2015 #1
Should design a test that factors that in somehow. ErikJ Jan 2015 #42
This clearly shows that we need EVERYONE armed with automatic weapons. isobar Jan 2015 #2
Yes, and armor piercing bullets...to get those terrorists hiding behind the fridge! SunSeeker Jan 2015 #3
Behind the fridge?? isobar Jan 2015 #10
But my yogurt . . . tclambert Jan 2015 #14
LOL! blackspade Jan 2015 #36
You mean... Turbineguy Jan 2015 #37
Not to mention those dressed in bullet proof vests NewJeffCT Jan 2015 #40
we weaponized our cats. It turns out that is a very bad idea. nt. Warren Stupidity Jan 2015 #9
That is why I made no mention of arming cats. isobar Jan 2015 #11
The 2nd amendment is very clear. You're only supposed to arm bears. tclambert Jan 2015 #15
I'm not so sure that's a good idea.... isobar Jan 2015 #16
Who drew this? F4lconF16 Jan 2015 #32
It was an internet "steal". isobar Jan 2015 #33
... Dont call me Shirley Jan 2015 #29
What about sharks? NewJeffCT Jan 2015 #39
K & R SunSeeker Jan 2015 #4
So how did the terrorists get their guns? exboyfil Jan 2015 #5
Less "target rich environment" at the publication building? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #6
Mail order. isobar Jan 2015 #12
At Charlie Hebdo, the shooters called out the names of their targets. tclambert Jan 2015 #17
Is there a point to that observation? isobar Jan 2015 #18
I was replying to the observation that they killed fewer people than were killed at Sandy Hook. tclambert Jan 2015 #19
gotchya. isobar Jan 2015 #20
Weren't there also 2naSalit Jan 2015 #22
CORRECTION bobclark86 Jan 2015 #7
Big K&R! BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #8
This Bruce Willis fantasy world they live in doesn't hold up to reality very well. Rozlee Jan 2015 #13
Now that's hilarious!!!! TRoN33 Jan 2015 #25
^^^A thousand times this.^^^ nolabear Jan 2015 #27
Only in Texas turbinetree Jan 2015 #21
So much for the concept of "Live and Learn"... Ford_Prefect Jan 2015 #23
+1 daleanime Jan 2015 #30
I'm more surprised that Open Carry nuts would display the end results instead of hiding it. TRoN33 Jan 2015 #24
Reminds me of the Star Wars missile defense tests. louis-t Jan 2015 #26
K&R.... daleanime Jan 2015 #28
So sometimes "nothing changed", two times one was killed. Whats the point 7962 Jan 2015 #31
Clearly, the mistake here is having only one "good guy." The current movie trend... Moonwalk Jan 2015 #34
Well played, gun nuts, well played.... blackspade Jan 2015 #35
Did you know that there is video of this simulation on their web site? oberliner Jan 2015 #38
Politico: Guns are more likely to do more harm than good. ErikJ Jan 2015 #41
Meanwhile, on the link the argument from gun guys is the volunteer was outgunned..... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #43
The self of fear, or did FDR know about Jihad polynomial Jan 2015 #44
One guy with a pistol against two guys with rifles? AtheistCrusader Jan 2015 #45
good luck convincing the gun fetishists mwrguy Jan 2015 #46
I'm reminded of that mass shooting at a Colorado theater... JohnnyRingo Jan 2015 #47
Your telepathic abilities are duly noted as a useful tool for formulating public policy. n/t Shamash Jan 2015 #48
I guess there's a chance that not one person was carrying there. JohnnyRingo Jan 2015 #52
If you really want something to worry about, stand up and look straight down. Flatulo Jan 2015 #49
There was a good guy inside with a gun Lithos Jan 2015 #50
If I may borrow a quote from the show Burn Notice: Initech Jan 2015 #51
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Pic Of The Moment: Gun Gr...»Reply #52