Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: White House Drops 'News' from Fox News Placeholders at State of the Union Lunch [View all]Systematic Chaos
(8,601 posts)66. This is hilarious, and definitely called-for; BUT, it also could be called "petty."
Or, perhaps you would prefer "passive-aggressive."
What pisses me off about it, is that it's easy to fire off a move like this, and make a few waves.
So then, where the actual fuck have all the "waves" been with regards to single-payer health care? Or how about some serious "waves" for a $3 trillion infrastructure bill, to put 20 million people to work fixing the country?
Where are the statements which need to be shouted from the rooftops, again and again and again AND AGAIN AND AGAIN, until something of real worth gets done in this country?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
White House Drops 'News' from Fox News Placeholders at State of the Union Lunch [View all]
Grassy Knoll
Jan 2015
OP
Are they still in the front row of the WH press room? Put a dunce cap on them and they can stay.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#1
I'm sure most of them already know, they aren't all idiots but the money is good. n/t
A Simple Game
Jan 2015
#8
I have thought about that and I think that the ones in the know must feel like whores
Maraya1969
Jan 2015
#71
Good one. Come to think of it, why not admit Jon Stewart as a journalist. He's more of one than...
northoftheborder
Jan 2015
#29
Shep is one of the VERY few news people on Fox. That's why Fox took him off the news.
marble falls
Jan 2015
#56
Sly as a FOX. That term makes it easy to understand that FOX is not news; it is propaganda.
Dont call me Shirley
Jan 2015
#55
And none of the Fox viewers would have know about it without Shepard mentioning it
LiberalArkie
Jan 2015
#57
say what u will but you made it a point on tv so apparantly it bothers you more than youre
belzabubba333
Jan 2015
#58
This is hilarious, and definitely called-for; BUT, it also could be called "petty."
Systematic Chaos
Jan 2015
#66
I think that public proclamation from the White House was well-deserved - it ain't news
tomm2thumbs
Jan 2015
#67
I think Shep knows how the other side views FOX, it's all tongue in cheek for him.
YOHABLO
Jan 2015
#75