Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Robert Scheer on Hillary Clinton (he's not a fan) [View all]JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)41. I'm sure it consoled a lot of people in the crash of 2008.
We need to help each other in times of need. Welfare reform was a draconian and cruel program. Mothers forced to "train" for minimum wage jobs, leaving their small children in inadequate day-care arrangements so mama can work for "the man" at $7.25 per hour and less than 40 hours a week. Nonsense. Welfare reform should have at least been coupled with raising the minimum wage to a livable wage level. Even then, why should rich mothers have the choice to stay home with their children while poor mothers are forced to work at whatever wage they are offered? Makes no sense to me.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gee, from a so-called journalist who supported Rand Paul for Senate tells me all I need to know
still_one
Apr 2015
#2
In the discussion in the OP, Scheer suggests voting for Rand Paul for president
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2015
#71
Right it was the purists on the SCOTUS who gave us the coup of 2000 not Nader. Not to mention
Vincardog
Apr 2015
#64
Flaws? More like defects that can't be fixed. Thankfully, there's plenty of time to kick the tires on the Scooby van & consider other nominees.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Apr 2015
#26
+ 1000. I would add wealth inequality to your list. Hillary is part of the problem.
antigop
Apr 2015
#30
A Million Dead & Injured, 6 MIllion Displaced, a TRILLION DOLLARS down the toilet,
bvar22
Apr 2015
#63
HRC - The Manchurian Wall Street Candidate - The 99% Money Will Never Be Safe Again
cantbeserious
Apr 2015
#7
http://nativemobile.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Dont-Pity-the-1-Percent-Tapdaq-CMO-Seek
blkmusclmachine
Apr 2015
#13
Well it will not be necessary for me to agree with Robert Scheer's opinion of Hillary and one thing
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#15
What is wrong with providing training a person for a job while providing a safety net
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#25
I am not pessimistic, I am optimistic, ergo, I have worked in my life, and I appreciate opportunties
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#34
Look, I am talking about welfare reform, this was a complaint against Bill Clinton while he was in
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#36
You know child care is paid with safety net programs. At least traning programs usually provided
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#43
I think this is running off in a ditch, I do not have a problem with a mother staying home
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#61