Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Showing Original Post only (View all)How Hillary Ruined Her Legacy As Secretary of State [View all]
While Republicans have been distracted by phony scandals surrounding Hillary Clinton (like Benghazi), they missed one of the dirtiest scandals ever to emerge involving the former First Lady and current front-runner for the Democratic nomination in 2016.
A damning new report from the International Business Times explains how Hillary Clinton used her position as Secretary of State to create a pay-to-play atmosphere for world leaders seeking military equipment and defense contractors looking to make a few extra billions.
Ring of Fires Mike Papantonio and Farron Cousins discuss this.
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Under Clinton, the State Department approved $165 billion in commercial arms sales to 20 nations.
NYC_SKP
Jun 2015
#2
Yeah, but I'm continually told: "Where's the smoking gun? All you ever got with Hillary is her appearance of impropriety"...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2015
#53
I don't think she would survive an interview or a debate with a competent questioner.
NYC_SKP
Jun 2015
#55
I hear ya NYC. Unfortunately, because of Hillary's enablers, I think we're gonna be stuck with her as our nominee, unless Bernie or MOM gets a serious cash infusion...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2015
#61
There may be no 'smoking gun' in the sense of absolute proof of illegality, but . . .
markpkessinger
Jun 2015
#68
Of course it raises questions; that's why Hillary is wise to avoid answerin those questions - u gotta give her credit for that at least.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2015
#73
Question: Did Hillary Clinton personally benefit from these various arms sales???
NYC_SKP
Jun 2015
#57
Yes, I think she benefited. Will that hurt her legacy? I doubt it. Sadly, USA makes its
NCjack
Jun 2015
#64
That IBT article has been posted several times.. IBT is owned by religious nutcases
OKNancy
Jun 2015
#5
I am sorry I could not seem to find a "Moon" type link at Wiki, I am probably wrong, Usually am.
LiberalArkie
Jun 2015
#14
One of The Family top dogs David Coe quotes that always gives me shudders....
peacebird
Jun 2015
#52
When you attack the source, it's usually because there's no way counter the TRUTH.
NYC_SKP
Jun 2015
#54
they COULD be checked... or Sirota could be misquoting and misleading as he's often done
wyldwolf
Jun 2015
#22
How about the US State dept. & The Clinton Foundation Donor list are they misleading liars too
raindaddy
Jun 2015
#38
'Progressives' still looking for their smoking gun, using any source towards that goal
wyldwolf
Jun 2015
#10
We've got to be careful about hating on the RWers. They may end up voting for Bernie
libdem4life
Jun 2015
#62
Trashing the source- What the old school campaigners seem to miss.... is this is a new era.
Jesus Malverde
Jun 2015
#76