Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: How Hillary Ruined Her Legacy As Secretary of State [View all]Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)26. The only reliable sources are polls from 2013 and anti-Left DU'ers
Who accuse Democratic candidates of being segregationist gun-nuts.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Under Clinton, the State Department approved $165 billion in commercial arms sales to 20 nations.
NYC_SKP
Jun 2015
#2
Yeah, but I'm continually told: "Where's the smoking gun? All you ever got with Hillary is her appearance of impropriety"...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2015
#53
I don't think she would survive an interview or a debate with a competent questioner.
NYC_SKP
Jun 2015
#55
I hear ya NYC. Unfortunately, because of Hillary's enablers, I think we're gonna be stuck with her as our nominee, unless Bernie or MOM gets a serious cash infusion...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2015
#61
There may be no 'smoking gun' in the sense of absolute proof of illegality, but . . .
markpkessinger
Jun 2015
#68
Of course it raises questions; that's why Hillary is wise to avoid answerin those questions - u gotta give her credit for that at least.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2015
#73
Question: Did Hillary Clinton personally benefit from these various arms sales???
NYC_SKP
Jun 2015
#57
Yes, I think she benefited. Will that hurt her legacy? I doubt it. Sadly, USA makes its
NCjack
Jun 2015
#64
That IBT article has been posted several times.. IBT is owned by religious nutcases
OKNancy
Jun 2015
#5
I am sorry I could not seem to find a "Moon" type link at Wiki, I am probably wrong, Usually am.
LiberalArkie
Jun 2015
#14
One of The Family top dogs David Coe quotes that always gives me shudders....
peacebird
Jun 2015
#52
When you attack the source, it's usually because there's no way counter the TRUTH.
NYC_SKP
Jun 2015
#54
they COULD be checked... or Sirota could be misquoting and misleading as he's often done
wyldwolf
Jun 2015
#22
How about the US State dept. & The Clinton Foundation Donor list are they misleading liars too
raindaddy
Jun 2015
#38
'Progressives' still looking for their smoking gun, using any source towards that goal
wyldwolf
Jun 2015
#10
We've got to be careful about hating on the RWers. They may end up voting for Bernie
libdem4life
Jun 2015
#62
Trashing the source- What the old school campaigners seem to miss.... is this is a new era.
Jesus Malverde
Jun 2015
#76